Skip to content

[dyninst] Expose more dyninst debug data via flares#47953

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
piob-io/dyninst-flares
Mar 20, 2026
Merged

[dyninst] Expose more dyninst debug data via flares#47953
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
piob-io/dyninst-flares

Conversation

@piob-io
Copy link
Contributor

@piob-io piob-io commented Mar 17, 2026

No description provided.

@piob-io piob-io requested review from a team as code owners March 17, 2026 19:23
@piob-io piob-io requested a review from dustmop March 17, 2026 19:23
Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 9cc76edaae

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +89 to +91
discoveredTypes := make(map[string][]string, len(s.discoveredTypes))
for svc, types := range s.discoveredTypes {
discoveredTypes[svc] = types

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Deep-copy discovered type slices before returning debug state

state.debugInfo() copies s.discoveredTypes into a new map but reuses each slice (discoveredTypes[svc] = types), so /dynamic_instrumentation/debug/state can end up JSON-encoding slice memory that the actuator event loop mutates later (for example while handling eventMissingTypesReported). That makes the debug endpoint and flare collection racy and can produce corrupted or inconsistent discovered_types output under concurrent probe activity.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems legit enough

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

Copy link
Contributor

@dustmop dustmop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM for agent-configuration owned files

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Mar 17, 2026

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor d7186e78:

Results for datadog-agent_7.79.0~devel.git.17.46a5098.pipeline.103739422-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts bot added internal Identify a non-fork PR team/agent-configuration labels Mar 17, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot added the medium review PR review might take time label Mar 17, 2026
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Mar 17, 2026

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor d7186e7
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

Successful checks

Info

Quality gate Change Size (prev → curr → max)
agent_deb_amd64 +40.0 KiB (0.01% increase) 750.712 → 750.751 → 753.380
agent_deb_amd64_fips +36.0 KiB (0.00% increase) 707.640 → 707.675 → 713.900
agent_heroku_amd64 +4.0 KiB (0.00% increase) 313.011 → 313.015 → 320.580
agent_rpm_amd64 +40.0 KiB (0.01% increase) 750.696 → 750.735 → 753.350
agent_rpm_amd64_fips +36.0 KiB (0.00% increase) 707.624 → 707.659 → 713.880
agent_rpm_arm64 +36.0 KiB (0.00% increase) 729.023 → 729.058 → 735.290
agent_rpm_arm64_fips +36.0 KiB (0.01% increase) 689.015 → 689.050 → 696.840
agent_suse_amd64 +40.0 KiB (0.01% increase) 750.696 → 750.735 → 753.350
agent_suse_amd64_fips +36.0 KiB (0.00% increase) 707.624 → 707.659 → 713.880
agent_suse_arm64 +36.0 KiB (0.00% increase) 729.023 → 729.058 → 735.290
agent_suse_arm64_fips +36.0 KiB (0.01% increase) 689.015 → 689.050 → 696.840
docker_agent_amd64 +40.0 KiB (0.00% increase) 811.031 → 811.070 → 815.700
docker_agent_arm64 +36.0 KiB (0.00% increase) 814.172 → 814.207 → 821.970
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 +40.0 KiB (0.00% increase) 1001.946 → 1001.985 → 1006.580
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 +36.0 KiB (0.00% increase) 993.866 → 993.901 → 1001.570
iot_agent_deb_amd64 +4.0 KiB (0.01% increase) 43.230 → 43.234 → 43.290
iot_agent_deb_arm64 +4.0 KiB (0.01% increase) 40.281 → 40.285 → 40.920
iot_agent_deb_armhf +4.0 KiB (0.01% increase) 41.024 → 41.028 → 41.030
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 +4.0 KiB (0.01% increase) 43.231 → 43.234 → 43.290
iot_agent_suse_amd64 +4.0 KiB (0.01% increase) 43.231 → 43.234 → 43.290
10 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
Quality gate Current Size
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 205.292 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 219.614 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 7.142 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 6.689 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 39.215 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 37.445 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 29.855 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 28.007 MiB
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 29.855 MiB
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 29.855 MiB
On-wire sizes (compressed)
Quality gate Change Size (prev → curr → max)
agent_deb_amd64 +5.02 KiB (0.00% increase) 174.677 → 174.682 → 178.360
agent_deb_amd64_fips -41.95 KiB (0.02% reduction) 165.216 → 165.175 → 172.790
agent_heroku_amd64 +3.52 KiB (0.00% increase) 74.946 → 74.950 → 79.970
agent_rpm_amd64 -13.0 KiB (0.01% reduction) 177.527 → 177.514 → 181.830
agent_rpm_amd64_fips -6.84 KiB (0.00% reduction) 167.262 → 167.255 → 173.370
agent_rpm_arm64 -11.65 KiB (0.01% reduction) 159.534 → 159.522 → 163.060
agent_rpm_arm64_fips -43.82 KiB (0.03% reduction) 151.290 → 151.247 → 156.170
agent_suse_amd64 -13.0 KiB (0.01% reduction) 177.527 → 177.514 → 181.830
agent_suse_amd64_fips -6.84 KiB (0.00% reduction) 167.262 → 167.255 → 173.370
agent_suse_arm64 -11.65 KiB (0.01% reduction) 159.534 → 159.522 → 163.060
agent_suse_arm64_fips -43.82 KiB (0.03% reduction) 151.290 → 151.247 → 156.170
docker_agent_amd64 +8.55 KiB (0.00% increase) 267.878 → 267.887 → 272.480
docker_agent_arm64 neutral 255.089 MiB → 261.060
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 +4.81 KiB (0.00% increase) 336.528 → 336.533 → 341.100
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 neutral 319.731 MiB → 325.620
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 neutral 71.921 MiB → 72.920
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 neutral 67.506 MiB → 68.220
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 neutral 2.999 MiB → 3.330
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 neutral 2.729 MiB → 3.090
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 neutral 15.161 MiB → 15.820
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 neutral 14.480 MiB → 14.830
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 neutral 7.887 MiB → 8.790
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 neutral 6.773 MiB → 7.710
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 +2.25 KiB (0.03% increase) 7.898 → 7.900 → 8.800
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 +2.25 KiB (0.03% increase) 7.898 → 7.900 → 8.800
iot_agent_deb_amd64 neutral 11.388 MiB → 12.040
iot_agent_deb_arm64 neutral 9.697 MiB → 10.450
iot_agent_deb_armhf neutral 9.931 MiB → 10.620
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 neutral 11.406 MiB → 12.060
iot_agent_suse_amd64 neutral 11.406 MiB → 12.060

@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da
Copy link

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da bot commented Mar 17, 2026

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 93c3269f-e588-4108-90a9-4be99f6cf15a

Baseline: 0af0a9f
Comparison: d63a0ad
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization +1.90 [-1.16, +4.96] 1 Logs

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization +1.90 [-1.16, +4.96] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +1.52 [+1.39, +1.65] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative memory utilization +0.91 [+0.77, +1.06] 1 Logs
otlp_ingest_metrics memory utilization +0.76 [+0.59, +0.92] 1 Logs
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization +0.20 [-0.04, +0.44] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders memory utilization +0.15 [+0.09, +0.21] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.12 [+0.07, +0.17] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter memory utilization +0.11 [-0.11, +0.34] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_delta memory utilization +0.07 [-0.09, +0.24] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.04 [-0.35, +0.42] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.03 [-0.47, +0.53] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.21, +0.19] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.08, +0.06] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.12, +0.10] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3 ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.20, +0.18] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics memory utilization -0.02 [-0.20, +0.17] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.04 [-0.47, +0.38] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.24 [-0.30, -0.19] 1 Logs
otlp_ingest_logs memory utilization -0.32 [-0.42, -0.21] 1 Logs
docker_containers_memory memory utilization -0.41 [-0.49, -0.34] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.43 [-0.47, -0.39] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
ddot_logs memory utilization -0.56 [-0.62, -0.50] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -2.28 [-3.83, -0.73] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed observed_value links
docker_containers_cpu simple_check_run 10/10 681 ≥ 26
docker_containers_memory memory_usage 10/10 280.50MiB ≤ 370MiB
docker_containers_memory simple_check_run 10/10 721 ≥ 26
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.19GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.24GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.20GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.21GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 3 = 3 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 173.73MiB ≤ 175MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 2 ≤ 3 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 490.04MiB ≤ 550MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 207.03MiB ≤ 220MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 351.76 ≤ 2000 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 411.86MiB ≤ 475MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

Copy link
Contributor

@ajwerner ajwerner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM thanks for doing it! Might be nice to have some basic testing if you felt so inclined just to make sure we're not doing something really dumb in future refactors.

Comment on lines +57 to +63
// DiagnosticsDebugInfo contains the state of all diagnostic trackers.
type DiagnosticsDebugInfo struct {
Received []DiagnosticsEntry `json:"received"`
Installed []DiagnosticsEntry `json:"installed"`
Emitted []DiagnosticsEntry `json:"emitted"`
Errors []DiagnosticsEntry `json:"errors"`
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this will end up being annoying to consume. How do you feel about transposing this so it is keyed on probe id and version and then has the diagnostics that have been sent?

// Copy the dynamic instrumentation tombstone file if it exists.
// This file persists probe definitions across restarts and is
// valuable for debugging even when system-probe is not running.
const dyninstTombstonePath = "/tmp/datadog-agent/system-probe/dynamic-instrumentation/debugger-probes-tombstone.json"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

did we hard-code this to /tmp and not os.TempDir? Seems like bad behavior by us!

Comment on lines +89 to +91
discoveredTypes := make(map[string][]string, len(s.discoveredTypes))
for svc, types := range s.discoveredTypes {
discoveredTypes[svc] = types
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems legit enough

@piob-io piob-io force-pushed the piob-io/dyninst-flares branch 2 times, most recently from 156dcdc to 9fca295 Compare March 18, 2026 20:40
@piob-io
Copy link
Contributor Author

piob-io commented Mar 18, 2026

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351
Copy link

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 bot commented Mar 18, 2026

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-03-18 20:54:00 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-03-18 20:54:06 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This pull request is not mergeable according to GitHub. Common reasons include pending required checks, missing approvals, or merge conflicts — but it could also be blocked by other repository rules or settings.
It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals. View in MergeQueue UI.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.


2026-03-19 01:00:23 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

devflow unqueued this merge request: It did not become mergeable within the expected time

@piob-io piob-io added changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/debugger-go and removed team/agent-configuration labels Mar 19, 2026
@piob-io piob-io force-pushed the piob-io/dyninst-flares branch from 9fca295 to 11e07eb Compare March 19, 2026 14:22
@piob-io
Copy link
Contributor Author

piob-io commented Mar 19, 2026

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351
Copy link

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 bot commented Mar 19, 2026

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-03-19 14:29:37 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-03-19 14:29:43 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This pull request is not mergeable according to GitHub. Common reasons include pending required checks, missing approvals, or merge conflicts — but it could also be blocked by other repository rules or settings.
It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals. View in MergeQueue UI.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.


2026-03-19 18:30:07 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

devflow unqueued this merge request: It did not become mergeable within the expected time

@piob-io
Copy link
Contributor Author

piob-io commented Mar 19, 2026

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351
Copy link

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 bot commented Mar 19, 2026

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-03-19 17:53:19 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-03-19 17:53:21 UTC ❌ MergeQueue

PR already in the queue with status waiting

@piob-io
Copy link
Contributor Author

piob-io commented Mar 19, 2026

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351
Copy link

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 bot commented Mar 19, 2026

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-03-19 18:31:14 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-03-19 18:31:22 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This pull request is not mergeable according to GitHub. Common reasons include pending required checks, missing approvals, or merge conflicts — but it could also be blocked by other repository rules or settings.
It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals. View in MergeQueue UI.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.


2026-03-19 19:08:07 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: merge request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 2h (p90).


2026-03-19 19:53:17 UTCMergeQueue: The build pipeline failed for this merge request

Build pipeline has failing jobs for a06590b:

⚠️ Do NOT retry failed jobs directly (why?).

What to do next?

  • Investigate the failures and when ready, re-add your pull request to the queue!
  • If your PR checks are green, try to rebase/merge. It might be because the CI run is a bit old.
  • Any question, go check the FAQ.

@piob-io
Copy link
Contributor Author

piob-io commented Mar 19, 2026

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351
Copy link

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 bot commented Mar 19, 2026

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-03-19 19:54:33 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-03-19 19:54:37 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 2h (p90).


2026-03-19 21:04:03 UTCMergeQueue: The build pipeline failed for this merge request

Build pipeline has failing jobs for 37aae0d:

⚠️ Do NOT retry failed jobs directly (why?).

What to do next?

  • Investigate the failures and when ready, re-add your pull request to the queue!
  • If your PR checks are green, try to rebase/merge. It might be because the CI run is a bit old.
  • Any question, go check the FAQ.

@piob-io
Copy link
Contributor Author

piob-io commented Mar 19, 2026

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351
Copy link

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 bot commented Mar 19, 2026

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-03-19 21:05:19 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-03-19 21:05:24 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 2h (p90).


2026-03-19 21:44:08 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: Readding this merge request to the queue because another merge request processed with yours failed. No action is needed from your side.


2026-03-19 22:25:13 UTCMergeQueue: The build pipeline contains failing jobs for this merge request

Build pipeline has failing jobs for 3d971ff:

⚠️ Do NOT retry failed jobs directly (why?).

What to do next?

  • Investigate the failures and when ready, re-add your pull request to the queue!
  • If your PR checks are green, try to rebase/merge. It might be because the CI run is a bit old.
  • Any question, go check the FAQ.
Details

Since those jobs are not marked as being allowed to fail, the pipeline will most likely fail.
Therefore, and to allow other builds to be processed, this merge request has been rejected and the pipeline got canceled.

@piob-io
Copy link
Contributor Author

piob-io commented Mar 19, 2026

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351
Copy link

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 bot commented Mar 19, 2026

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-03-19 22:51:21 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-03-19 22:51:25 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 1h (p90).


2026-03-19 23:30:38 UTCMergeQueue: The build pipeline failed for this merge request

Build pipeline has failing jobs for 42b528f:

⚠️ Do NOT retry failed jobs directly (why?).

What to do next?

  • Investigate the failures and when ready, re-add your pull request to the queue!
  • If your PR checks are green, try to rebase/merge. It might be because the CI run is a bit old.
  • Any question, go check the FAQ.

@piob-io piob-io force-pushed the piob-io/dyninst-flares branch from 5cae8bc to ba49d34 Compare March 20, 2026 00:38
@piob-io
Copy link
Contributor Author

piob-io commented Mar 20, 2026

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351
Copy link

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 bot commented Mar 20, 2026

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-03-20 00:39:09 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-03-20 00:39:15 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This pull request is not mergeable according to GitHub. Common reasons include pending required checks, missing approvals, or merge conflicts — but it could also be blocked by other repository rules or settings.
It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals. View in MergeQueue UI.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.


2026-03-20 04:54:04 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

devflow unqueued this merge request: It did not become mergeable within the expected time

@github-actions github-actions bot added long review PR is complex, plan time to review it and removed medium review PR review might take time labels Mar 20, 2026
@piob-io
Copy link
Contributor Author

piob-io commented Mar 20, 2026

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351
Copy link

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 bot commented Mar 20, 2026

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-03-20 14:33:15 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-03-20 14:33:24 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This pull request is not mergeable according to GitHub. Common reasons include pending required checks, missing approvals, or merge conflicts — but it could also be blocked by other repository rules or settings.
It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals. View in MergeQueue UI.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.


2026-03-20 15:59:11 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: merge request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 1h (p90).


2026-03-20 17:39:17 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@piob-io
Copy link
Contributor Author

piob-io commented Mar 20, 2026

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351
Copy link

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 bot commented Mar 20, 2026

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-03-20 14:40:40 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-03-20 14:40:43 UTC ❌ MergeQueue

PR already in the queue with status waiting

@piob-io piob-io force-pushed the piob-io/dyninst-flares branch from ba49d34 to 46a5098 Compare March 20, 2026 14:41
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d bot merged commit d63a0ad into main Mar 20, 2026
311 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d bot deleted the piob-io/dyninst-flares branch March 20, 2026 17:39
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.79.0 milestone Mar 20, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed internal Identify a non-fork PR long review PR is complex, plan time to review it qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/agent-configuration team/debugger-go

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants