Skip to content

chore(deps): update anthropics/claude-code-action action to v1.0.75#48122

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/anthropics-claude-code-action-1.x
Mar 20, 2026
Merged

chore(deps): update anthropics/claude-code-action action to v1.0.75#48122
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/anthropics-claude-code-action-1.x

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 20, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
anthropics/claude-code-action action patch v1.0.72v1.0.75

Release Notes

anthropics/claude-code-action (anthropics/claude-code-action)

v1.0.75

Compare Source

Full Changelog: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1...v1.0.75

v1.0.74

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1...v1.0.74

v1.0.73

Compare Source

Full Changelog: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1...v1.0.73


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "on saturday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 20, 2026 14:06
@renovate renovate bot added changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed dependencies PRs that bump a dependency dependencies-github-actions qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation labels Mar 20, 2026
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts bot added internal Identify a non-fork PR team/agent-devx labels Mar 20, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Mar 20, 2026
@dd-octo-sts
Copy link
Contributor

dd-octo-sts bot commented Mar 20, 2026

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351
Copy link

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 bot commented Mar 20, 2026

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-03-20 14:08:28 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-03-20 14:08:35 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This pull request is not mergeable according to GitHub. Common reasons include pending required checks, missing approvals, or merge conflicts — but it could also be blocked by other repository rules or settings.
It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals. View in MergeQueue UI.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.


2026-03-20 14:52:09 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: merge request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 1h (p90).


2026-03-20 16:59:30 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor 178cf93a:

Results for datadog-agent_7.78.0~devel.git.770.dc7c229.pipeline.103729169-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d bot merged commit 6426708 into main Mar 20, 2026
281 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d bot deleted the renovate/anthropics-claude-code-action-1.x branch March 20, 2026 16:59
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.79.0 milestone Mar 20, 2026
@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da
Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: bbbabe25-0958-4cab-a01c-e06b8242a7d9

Baseline: b2ca310
Comparison: 6426708
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization +2.13 [-0.95, +5.21] 1 Logs

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +2.45 [+0.87, +4.02] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization +2.13 [-0.95, +5.21] 1 Logs
docker_containers_memory memory utilization +1.57 [+1.44, +1.71] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization +0.39 [+0.34, +0.44] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics memory utilization +0.37 [+0.19, +0.54] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders memory utilization +0.31 [+0.25, +0.37] 1 Logs
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization +0.20 [-0.04, +0.44] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter memory utilization +0.19 [-0.03, +0.42] 1 Logs
otlp_ingest_metrics memory utilization +0.14 [-0.02, +0.30] 1 Logs
otlp_ingest_logs memory utilization +0.13 [+0.04, +0.22] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.06 [-0.36, +0.47] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.02 [-0.49, +0.53] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.20, +0.20] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3 ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.21, +0.20] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.01 [-0.05, +0.04] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.12, +0.10] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.01 [-0.05, +0.03] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.05 [-0.44, +0.34] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.06 [-0.16, +0.04] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_delta memory utilization -0.08 [-0.26, +0.09] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative memory utilization -0.27 [-0.41, -0.13] 1 Logs
ddot_logs memory utilization -0.31 [-0.38, -0.24] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.84 [-0.96, -0.72] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed observed_value links
docker_containers_cpu simple_check_run 10/10 694 ≥ 26
docker_containers_memory memory_usage 10/10 274.84MiB ≤ 370MiB
docker_containers_memory simple_check_run 10/10 703 ≥ 26
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.19GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.23GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.19GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.22GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 3 = 3 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 174.55MiB ≤ 175MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 2 ≤ 3 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 492.98MiB ≤ 550MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 4 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 204.28MiB ≤ 220MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 347.01 ≤ 2000 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 4 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 415.80MiB ≤ 475MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed dependencies PRs that bump a dependency dependencies-github-actions internal Identify a non-fork PR qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/agent-devx

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant