Skip to content

Conversation

@cswatt
Copy link
Contributor

@cswatt cswatt commented Jan 22, 2026

What does this PR do? What is the motivation?

Moved some files from the infrastructure section into the containers section, rearranging some information

Merge instructions

Merge readiness:

  • Ready for merge

For Datadog employees:

Your branch name MUST follow the <name>/<description> convention and include the forward slash (/). Without this format, your pull request will not pass CI, the GitLab pipeline will not run, and you won't get a branch preview. Getting a branch preview makes it easier for us to check any issues with your PR, such as broken links.

If your branch doesn't follow this format, rename it or create a new branch and PR.

[6/5/2025] Merge queue has been disabled on the documentation repo. If you have write access to the repo, the PR has been reviewed by a Documentation team member, and all of the required checks have passed, you can use the Squash and Merge button to merge the PR. If you don't have write access, or you need help, reach out in the #documentation channel in Slack.

Additional notes

@cswatt cswatt requested review from a team as code owners January 22, 2026 23:07
@cswatt cswatt added the editorial review Waiting on a more in-depth review label Jan 22, 2026
@cswatt cswatt mentioned this pull request Jan 22, 2026
1 task
@git-thuerk-done
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ceciliawatt when you have a moment can you fix the merge conflict so it will build the staging links? Thank you!

Copy link
Contributor

@git-thuerk-done git-thuerk-done left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @cswatt this looks great, I have just a few minor suggestions and then a suggestion for layout of the main containers/ page but perhaps for another iteration :)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A general comment on this page as it's quite long, maybe for the next iteration you could consider using the multi-code-lang feature

Here is a PR where I used it on a page that contains non-traditional "code-lang" definitions, and the live page, so you can see how it looks, totally just an idea though!
The idea then would be to have buttons on the top (Docker, Kubernetes, Amazon, etc)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Considering this is essentially a directory page, used mostly as a site map / by crawlers, and pretty easy to scan, I don't think the length is much of an issue. I think the multi-code-lang solution may actually make this page more difficult to parse by external crawlers.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I noticed these are hidden (not on left hand nav, assume this is intentional) ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yup, intentional — they're FAQs

@github-actions github-actions bot added Architecture Everything related to the Doc backend FAQ Content impacting a FAQ labels Jan 27, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@git-thuerk-done git-thuerk-done left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good!

@cswatt cswatt merged commit c0e0bdf into master Jan 28, 2026
21 of 22 checks passed
@cswatt cswatt deleted the cswatt/cont-reorg-2 branch January 28, 2026 15:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Architecture Everything related to the Doc backend editorial review Waiting on a more in-depth review FAQ Content impacting a FAQ

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants