performance(check-agent): test to reduce buffer size numbers#665
performance(check-agent): test to reduce buffer size numbers#665GustavoCaso wants to merge 6 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
GustavoCaso
changed the title
Regression Detector (DogStatsD)Regression Detector ResultsRun ID: 6c68e8e7-3381-41dd-a31d-3b6b6566b308 Baseline: 7.65.2 Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | dsd_uds_500mb_3k_contexts | ingress throughput | +0.47 | [+0.39, +0.55] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts_distributions_only | memory utilization | +0.37 | [+0.16, +0.58] | 1 | |
| ➖ | quality_gates_idle_rss | memory utilization | +0.19 | [+0.09, +0.29] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_512kb_3k_contexts | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts_memlimit | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts_dualship | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.10, +0.10] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_40mb_12k_contexts_40_senders | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_100mb_250k_contexts | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.10, +0.10] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_10mb_3k_contexts | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.08, +0.07] | 1 |
Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | quality_gates_idle_rss | memory_usage | 0/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
Regression Detector (Checks Agent Go)Regression Detector ResultsRun ID: acda33ec-31c1-463f-a7ea-d7685d9848f7 Baseline: f61d1f4e054b884cb1894254ab2714b84b4684cb Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | quality_gates_rss | memory utilization | +0.02 | [-0.04, +0.08] | 1 | |
| ➖ | quality_gates_idle_rss | memory utilization | -0.16 | [-0.21, -0.11] | 1 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
Regression Detector (Saluki)Regression Detector ResultsRun ID: 9af277fc-11c8-487a-a0f7-691298ec19aa Baseline: 7b38aae Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | quality_gates_idle_rss | memory utilization | +0.78 | [+0.73, +0.83] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_40mb_12k_contexts_40_senders | ingress throughput | +0.32 | [+0.20, +0.45] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_10mb_3k_contexts | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.02, +0.04] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_512kb_3k_contexts | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.01, +0.02] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts_memlimit | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.00, +0.01] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_50mb_10k_contexts_no_inlining | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.10, +0.10] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_50mb_10k_contexts_no_inlining_no_allocs | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.11, +0.11] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.02, +0.00] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts_dualship | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.02, +0.01] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.08, +0.06] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.02, +0.00] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_500mb_3k_contexts | ingress throughput | -0.31 | [-0.43, -0.19] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_100mb_250k_contexts | ingress throughput | -0.56 | [-0.74, -0.38] | 1 | |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts_distributions_only | memory utilization | -0.84 | [-0.99, -0.68] | 1 |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | quality_gates_idle_rss | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
Regression Detector (Checks Agent)Regression Detector ResultsRun ID: 4221abd2-6a51-495a-a515-2e8d29eac0ac Baseline: 7b38aae Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | quality_gates_rss | memory utilization | -0.51 | [-0.52, -0.49] | 1 | |
| ➖ | quality_gates_idle_rss | memory utilization | -0.86 | [-0.87, -0.84] | 1 |
Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | quality_gates_rss | memory_usage | 0/10 | |
| ✅ | quality_gates_idle_rss | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
Regression Detector LinksADP Experiment Result Links
Checks Agent Experiment Result Links
|
GustavoCaso
force-pushed
the
gustavo.caso/reduce-checks-agent-buffer-size
branch
from
a4ec0b8 to
3e6daac
Compare
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
GustavoCaso
changed the title
…into gustavo.caso/reduce-checks-agent-buffer-size
2 participants
Summary
Reduce buffer size to see if the RSS footprint is affected by this change
Change Type
How did you test this PR?
References