Skip to content

Conversation

@L3n41c
Copy link
Member

@L3n41c L3n41c commented Oct 23, 2025

What does this PR do?

Which scenarios this will impact?

Motivation

Additional Notes

@L3n41c L3n41c force-pushed the lenaic/benchmarkeks branch 7 times, most recently from ae0fbe1 to 9c83256 Compare October 28, 2025 15:20
@L3n41c
Copy link
Member Author

L3n41c commented Oct 28, 2025

@codex review

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +103 to +105
for i := range nbInstances {
o := patchObject(obj, func(s string) string {
return strings.ReplaceAll(s, "{{i}}", strconv.Itoa(i))

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P0 Badge Replace invalid range loop over integer

The churn job builds with for i := range nbInstances where nbInstances is an int. Primitive integers are not iterable, so this code does not compile (cannot range over nbInstances (type int)). The same construct appears in the deferred cleanup loop as well. Iterate with an index (for i := 0; i < nbInstances; i++) or convert to a slice to allow the project to build.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@codex You should read https://go.dev/doc/go1.22#language.
It seems that your Go knowledge is a little bit outdated.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment on lines 55 to 56
baseName := baseName + "-" + platform

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P0 Badge Fix short variable declaration with no new identifiers

After adding the baseName parameter, the Linux path still redeclares it with baseName := baseName + "-" + platform. Because no new identifiers appear on the left side, this statement fails to compile (no new variables on left side of :=). Use an assignment (baseName = baseName + "-" + platform) or a new variable name so the function builds.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Member Author

@L3n41c L3n41c Oct 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@codex It actually does compile.

@L3n41c L3n41c force-pushed the lenaic/benchmarkeks branch 2 times, most recently from 60d7d2d to 7085821 Compare October 30, 2025 10:00
@L3n41c L3n41c force-pushed the lenaic/benchmarkeks branch from 7085821 to b5e3b2a Compare October 30, 2025 17:11
@L3n41c L3n41c marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2025 15:47
@L3n41c L3n41c requested a review from a team as a code owner October 31, 2025 15:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants