-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Add intermediate model tracking contributions in Congressional races #24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add intermediate model tracking contributions in Congressional races #24
Conversation
Hi @risafangs |
cdf7826
to
0c5f913
Compare
Recce SummaryManifest Information
Lineage GraphNo changed module was detected. Checks Summary
See PR page: https://cloud.datarecce.io/DataRecce/TodoFEC-dbt/pulls/24 Next StepsTo view detailed Recce results:
|
@even-wei Sorry for the delay! Looks like CI worked, not sure how to read the Cloud output. |
Hi @risafangs Thanks for making the CI work! However, you can try Recce locally, here is the steps. |
Hi @risafangs Sorry for the late reply, I have finished the configuration for Recce Cloud. Re the discussion part:
I think those two questions came to the same end. What do we want to know. |
Hi @even-wei! I was able to get the recce server up to see the changes in UI based on the instructions you shared, which was super cool. The
I do have a On the modeling piece - I personally think it would be preferable to have a generic model that includes contributions to all types of candidates and filter on Presidential/House/Senate/etc in the analytical/reporting models. This way the same model could be used as the base to answer any questions around contribution types, like |
Hi @risafangs, sorry for the late reply. To use
But I think it's fine as you can see the local version already. Regarding the modeling, I like the idea. Would you like to create issues for each of your proposal. Then I can merge this PR, and we can move to one of the races. |
What
Output
Why
For discussion