Skip to content

Conversation

@edolstra
Copy link
Collaborator

@edolstra edolstra commented Jan 23, 2026

Motivation

Context

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved internal validation to prevent potential edge cases with value retrieval.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A condition in NixWasmInstance::getValue was tightened to reject id == 0 as invalid, in addition to the existing boundary check for id >= values.size(). This single-line modification prevents retrieval of values using ID 0.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
WASM Value Validation
src/libexpr/primops/wasm.cc
Tightened condition in getValue method to treat id == 0 as an invalid identifier alongside the existing size boundary check

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A single line hops into place,
Zero now knows its rightful disgrace,
Boundaries tighten, validation stands tall,
One tiny condition protects them all! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'builtins.wasm: Check against values with ID 0' clearly and specifically describes the main change: tightening a condition to treat id == 0 as invalid in the wasm module.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to pull request January 23, 2026 11:57 Inactive
@edolstra edolstra added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 23, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 7319060 Jan 23, 2026
28 checks passed
@edolstra edolstra deleted the wasm-value-check branch January 23, 2026 15:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants