Skip to content

Editor: unify value and reset(value) types (T1304359)#31023

Merged
marker-dao merged 15 commits intoDevExpress:25_1from
marker-dao:25_1_T1304359_reset_value_types
Sep 25, 2025
Merged

Editor: unify value and reset(value) types (T1304359)#31023
marker-dao merged 15 commits intoDevExpress:25_1from
marker-dao:25_1_T1304359_reset_value_types

Conversation

@marker-dao
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@marker-dao marker-dao requested a review from a team September 9, 2025 14:42
@marker-dao marker-dao self-assigned this Sep 9, 2025
@marker-dao marker-dao requested a review from a team as a code owner September 9, 2025 14:42
@marker-dao marker-dao force-pushed the 25_1_T1304359_reset_value_types branch from 89f8c3d to 9e5c2f2 Compare September 9, 2025 15:52
@marker-dao marker-dao force-pushed the 25_1_T1304359_reset_value_types branch from 9e5c2f2 to 35fad88 Compare September 25, 2025 08:49
* @docid
* @hidden
*/
export interface EditorValuableObject {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't really understand this name. Why is this object valuable?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@marker-dao marker-dao Sep 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because it contains value. This utility interface with @hidden doctag ensures that all types that extend EditorValuableObject will contain a value field.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay. I may not understand this to full extent, but believe me when I say that the current name is not it, even if it will be hidden.

I have a little pile of names for you to choose from. If you think one of them is okay, go on and rename. If not, I will come up with something else:
EditorHasValueObject
EditorWithValueObject
EditorValueHolderObject

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

EditorOptionsWithValue

@marker-dao marker-dao merged commit 634d056 into DevExpress:25_1 Sep 25, 2025
310 checks passed
@marker-dao marker-dao deleted the 25_1_T1304359_reset_value_types branch September 25, 2025 13:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants