Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

The EAS Preview workflow was failing because it was pointing to the old frontend directory instead of the new mobile directory. This commit updates the working-directory in the .github/workflows/preview.yml file to mobile/ to resolve the issue.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 14168748993717187930 started by @Devasy23

The EAS Preview workflow was failing because it was pointing to the old `frontend` directory instead of the new `mobile` directory.

This commit updates the `working-directory` in the `.github/workflows/preview.yml` file to `mobile/` to resolve the issue.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 27, 2025

Deploy Preview for split-but-wiser canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit eb17f72
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/split-but-wiser/deploys/6927c7a8eaa3ae0008129e61

@Devasy Devasy marked this pull request as ready for review November 27, 2025 03:38
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 27, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.79%. Comparing base (d164ed5) to head (eb17f72).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #200   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.79%   72.79%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines        1669     1669           
  Branches      154      154           
=======================================
  Hits         1215     1215           
  Misses        400      400           
  Partials       54       54           
Components Coverage Δ
Authentication System 75.45% <ø> (ø)
Expense Management 69.88% <ø> (ø)
Group Management 69.49% <ø> (ø)
User Management 97.16% <ø> (ø)
Backend Core 69.41% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@Devasy Devasy closed this Nov 27, 2025
@Devasy Devasy deleted the fix/expo-preview-workflow branch November 27, 2025 05:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants