Skip to content

Conversation

@Devasy
Copy link
Owner

@Devasy Devasy commented Jun 19, 2025

Introduce a test suite for email-based authentication, covering registration and login scenarios, including error handling and input validation. Implement mocking for MongoDB and Firebase to ensure tests run in isolation. Add a GitHub Actions workflow to automate the execution of these tests on pull requests and pushes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced automated backend test suite for authentication routes, covering signup and login scenarios.
    • Added a GitHub Actions workflow to automatically run backend tests on pull requests and main branch updates.
  • Tests

    • Implemented comprehensive asynchronous tests for authentication endpoints, including input validation and error handling.
    • Added fixtures for mocking Firebase and MongoDB to support isolated and reliable test runs.
  • Chores

    • Updated backend dependencies to include testing and mocking libraries.
    • Added configuration files to streamline and standardize the testing environment.

google-labs-jules bot and others added 2 commits June 19, 2025 16:23
This commit introduces a test suite for the email-based authentication
endpoints (`/auth/signup/email` and `/auth/login/email`).

Key changes include:

1.  **Test Implementation (`backend/tests/auth/test_auth_routes.py`):**
    *   Comprehensive tests covering successful registration and login.
    *   Tests for error scenarios: existing email, incorrect password,
        non-existent user.
    *   Parameterized tests for invalid input validation (missing fields,
        short passwords, invalid email formats) returning 422 errors.

2.  **Mocking (`backend/tests/conftest.py`):**
    *   MongoDB Mocking: Implemented an auto-use pytest fixture (`mock_db`)
        using `mongomock-motor` to simulate MongoDB interactions. This
        fixture patches `app.auth.service.get_database` to ensure
        `AuthService` uses the mock database during tests.
    *   Firebase Mocking: Added a session-scoped fixture (`mock_firebase_admin`)
        to mock `firebase_admin.initialize_app`, `credentials.Certificate`,
        and `auth`. This prevents actual Firebase SDK initialization, which
        is not needed for these tests and might fail in CI environments.

3.  **Test Configuration (`backend/pytest.ini`):**
    *   Created `pytest.ini` to define test-specific environment
        variables (e.g., `SECRET_KEY`, `TESTING=True`).
    *   Configured `asyncio_mode` and test discovery patterns.

4.  **Dependencies (`backend/requirements.txt`):**
    *   Added `pytest`, `pytest-asyncio`, `httpx`, `mongomock-motor`,
        and `pytest-env` to support the testing framework and environment
        configuration.

All 13 tests for the authentication routes are passing. The test setup
ensures that tests are isolated and do not depend on external services
like a live MongoDB instance or Firebase.
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 19, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

New infrastructure for backend testing has been introduced. This includes a GitHub Actions workflow for automated test runs, pytest configuration, expanded backend test dependencies, and the addition of comprehensive authentication route tests. Test fixtures for mocking Firebase and MongoDB are also provided to enable isolated and reliable test execution.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/run-tests.yml Added a GitHub Actions workflow to run backend authentication tests on PRs and pushes to main/master/feature branches.
backend/pytest.ini Added pytest configuration for environment variables, asyncio support, and test discovery patterns.
backend/requirements.txt Added testing-related dependencies: pytest, pytest-asyncio, httpx, mongomock-motor, pytest-env.
backend/tests/auth/test_auth_routes.py Introduced comprehensive asynchronous tests for authentication endpoints, covering success and failure scenarios.
backend/tests/conftest.py Added fixtures to mock Firebase Admin SDK and MongoDB for isolated backend testing.

Poem

🐇
In the warren of code, new tests now appear,
With fixtures and mocks, the bugs disappear.
Pip installs the tools, GitHub runs the show,
Async routes are tested, green lights all aglow.
The backend hops forward, with confidence clear!


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Devasy
Copy link
Owner Author

Devasy commented Jun 19, 2025

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 19, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (8)
backend/tests/conftest.py (2)

5-5: Remove unused import.

The os import is not used in the code and should be removed.

-import os # Added

54-69: Remove debug print statements for cleaner test output.

The debug print statements should be removed from the production test fixtures to avoid cluttering the test output.

 @pytest_asyncio.fixture(scope="function", autouse=True)
 async def mock_db():
-    print("mock_db fixture: Creating AsyncMongoMockClient")
     mock_mongo_client = AsyncMongoMockClient()
-    print(f"mock_db fixture: mock_mongo_client type: {type(mock_mongo_client)}")
     mock_database_instance = mock_mongo_client["test_db"]
-    print(f"mock_db fixture: mock_database_instance type: {type(mock_database_instance)}, is None: {mock_database_instance is None}")

     # Ensure we are patching the correct target
     # 'app.database.get_database' is where the function is defined.
     # 'app.auth.service.get_database' is where it's imported and looked up by AuthService.
     # Patching where it's looked up can be more robust.

     with patch("app.auth.service.get_database", return_value=mock_database_instance) as mock_get_database_function:
-        print(f"mock_db fixture: Patching app.auth.service.get_database. Patched object: {mock_get_database_function}")
-        print(f"mock_db fixture: Patched return_value: {mock_get_database_function.return_value}, type: {type(mock_get_database_function.return_value)}")
         yield mock_database_instance # yield the same instance for direct use if needed
-        print("mock_db fixture: Restoring app.auth.service.get_database")
.github/workflows/run-tests.yml (2)

12-12: Remove trailing spaces.

There are trailing spaces on multiple lines that should be cleaned up for better code hygiene.

     runs-on: ubuntu-latest
-    
+
     steps:
     - uses: actions/checkout@v4
-    
+
       with:
         python-version: '3.12'
-        
+
         pip install -r requirements.txt
-        
+

Also applies to: 15-15, 20-20, 26-26


31-31: Consider running all tests instead of a specific file.

The workflow currently only runs tests from backend/tests/auth/test_auth_routes.py. Consider running all tests to ensure comprehensive coverage as the test suite grows.

-        pytest backend/tests/auth/test_auth_routes.py
+        pytest backend/tests/
backend/tests/auth/test_auth_routes.py (4)

3-3: Remove unused imports.

The imports for FastAPI and settings are not used in the test file and should be removed for cleaner code.

-from fastapi import FastAPI, status
+from fastapi import status
-from app.config import settings # To potentially override settings if needed, or check values

Also applies to: 5-5


27-27: Remove debug print statement.

The debug print statement should be removed from the production test code.

-    print(f"Response text for test_signup_with_email_success: {response.text}") # Print response text

107-116: Simplify conditional logic using logical OR operator.

The nested if-elif statements can be simplified by combining conditions with logical OR operators for better readability.

             # Specific checks for error types for Pydantic v2
-            if description == "short_password" and error_type == "string_too_short":
-                error_found = True
-                break
-            elif description == "invalid_email" and error_type == "value_error": # Simpler check, msg gives more detail
-                error_found = True
-                break
-            elif "missing" in description and error_type == "missing":
+            if (description == "short_password" and error_type == "string_too_short") or \
+               (description == "invalid_email" and error_type == "value_error") or \
+               ("missing" in description and error_type == "missing"):
                 error_found = True
                 break

234-240: Simplify conditional logic using logical OR operator.

Similar to the signup validation test, this conditional logic can be simplified.

-            if description == "invalid_email_format" and error_type == "value_error": # Simpler check
-                error_found = True
-                break
-            elif "missing" in description and error_type == "missing":
+            if (description == "invalid_email_format" and error_type == "value_error") or \
+               ("missing" in description and error_type == "missing"):
                 error_found = True
                 break
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7c7b60a and 42f7017.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/run-tests.yml (1 hunks)
  • backend/pytest.ini (1 hunks)
  • backend/requirements.txt (1 hunks)
  • backend/tests/auth/test_auth_routes.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/tests/conftest.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks (8.26.0)
backend/pytest.ini

3-3: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

🪛 actionlint (1.7.7)
.github/workflows/run-tests.yml

17-17: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
.github/workflows/run-tests.yml

[error] 12-12: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 15-15: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 20-20: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 26-26: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🪛 Ruff (0.11.9)
backend/tests/conftest.py

4-4: firebase_admin imported but unused

Remove unused import: firebase_admin

(F401)


5-5: os imported but unused

Remove unused import: os

(F401)

backend/tests/auth/test_auth_routes.py

3-3: fastapi.FastAPI imported but unused

Remove unused import: fastapi.FastAPI

(F401)


5-5: app.config.settings imported but unused

Remove unused import: app.config.settings

(F401)


107-112: Combine if branches using logical or operator

Combine if branches

(SIM114)


110-115: Combine if branches using logical or operator

Combine if branches

(SIM114)


234-239: Combine if branches using logical or operator

Combine if branches

(SIM114)

🪛 Pylint (3.3.7)
backend/tests/auth/test_auth_routes.py

[refactor] 107-115: Unnecessary "elif" after "break", remove the leading "el" from "elif"

(R1723)


[refactor] 234-239: Unnecessary "elif" after "break", remove the leading "el" from "elif"

(R1723)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
backend/pytest.ini (1)

1-14: Test configuration looks good.

The pytest configuration properly sets up the test environment with appropriate settings for async testing and test discovery patterns. The hardcoded SECRET_KEY is acceptable for testing purposes and clearly marked as such.

backend/tests/conftest.py (1)

8-50: Well-designed Firebase mocking strategy.

The session-scoped Firebase Admin SDK mocking is comprehensive and properly isolates external dependencies. The fixture correctly mocks all necessary Firebase components and handles cleanup appropriately.

backend/tests/auth/test_auth_routes.py (1)

18-241: Excellent test coverage and structure.

The test suite provides comprehensive coverage of authentication scenarios including:

  • Successful signup and login flows
  • Error handling for existing users and invalid credentials
  • Input validation with parametrized tests
  • Proper async testing patterns
  • Database interaction verification

The use of parametrized tests for validation scenarios is particularly well done, and the test isolation through mocking is properly implemented.

@Devasy Devasy merged commit d608b86 into feature/auth-service-workflow Jun 19, 2025
3 checks passed
@Devasy Devasy deleted the feat/auth-tests branch June 26, 2025 16:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants