forked from openai/codex
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
feat: Implement Lifecycle Hooks System - Phase 1 Complete #2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
mikeumus
wants to merge
6
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
feat/lifecycle-hooks-planning
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Add detailed implementation plan for Codex lifecycle hooks system - Define 7-phase implementation approach with 21 major sections - Include architecture overview, security considerations, and progress tracking - Establish foundation for programmatic interface to Codex lifecycle events - Support for scripts, webhooks, MCP tools, and custom executables as hooks
- Add comprehensive lifecycle hooks system foundation - Create core hook types and lifecycle events - Implement hook execution context with template substitution - Add hook configuration parsing and validation - Create hook registry and manager infrastructure - Add async hook executor framework with trait definitions - Update Cargo.toml with required dependencies (chrono, tempfile, async-trait) - Add hooks module to core library exports Completed Phase 1.1 tasks: ✅ Main hooks module with comprehensive documentation ✅ LifecycleEvent enum covering all major Codex lifecycle points ✅ HookType definitions for scripts, webhooks, MCP tools, executables ✅ HookContext with environment variables and temp file management ✅ Hook configuration system with TOML parsing and validation ✅ Hook registry for event routing and hook management ✅ Hook manager for coordinating hook execution ✅ Async hook executor framework with trait definitions Next: Phase 1.2 - Complete hook registry implementation
- Implement comprehensive hook registry with priority management - Add conditional execution support with expression evaluation - Support for equality, contains, and boolean conditions - Add hook filtering by tags and priority ranges - Implement hook statistics and registry management - Add hooks configuration integration with main Codex config - Support for runtime hook registration and removal - Add comprehensive test coverage for all registry features Completed Phase 1.2 tasks: ✅ Hook priority and dependency management with automatic sorting ✅ Conditional execution support with expression parser ✅ Hook registry statistics and management functions ✅ Integration with main Codex configuration system ✅ Runtime hook registration and removal capabilities ✅ Comprehensive test coverage with 12 passing tests Features implemented: - Priority-based hook execution ordering - Conditional hook execution with field-based expressions - Hook filtering by tags, priority ranges, and conditions - Registry statistics for monitoring and debugging - Integration with Codex Config and ConfigToml structs - Support for environment variable conditions - Template variable substitution in hook contexts Next: Phase 2.1 - Hook execution coordination and management
- Add comprehensive parallel development strategy to TODO.md - Create TODO-DEVELOPER-A.md for backend/execution engine work - Create TODO-DEVELOPER-B.md for frontend/documentation work - Define clear file ownership and coordination protocols - Establish branch strategy and communication guidelines - Set success criteria and progress tracking for both developers Workstream Split: 🔵 Developer A: Core Execution Engine (Backend Focus) - Phase 2: Hook Execution Engine - Phase 3: Event System Integration - Phase 6: Testing and Validation - 30 backend-focused tasks 🟢 Developer B: Client Integration & Documentation (Frontend/Docs Focus) - Phase 4: Client-Side Integration - Phase 5: Configuration and Documentation - Phase 7: Advanced Features - 40 frontend/docs-focused tasks Benefits: - Minimal file conflicts (clear ownership boundaries) - Parallel development without blocking dependencies - Clear communication protocols and merge strategies - Focused expertise areas for each developer - Comprehensive progress tracking and success metrics
- Add Phase 8: Magentic-One QA Integration to main TODO.md - Assign Magentic-One QA tasks to Developer B workstream - Add comprehensive Magentic-One implementation guide - Include safety protocols and container isolation - Add automated testing workflows and examples - Update progress tracking for all TODO files Phase 8 Features: 🤖 Magentic-One Setup and Configuration - Multi-agent system for automated QA - GPT-4o powered Orchestrator agent - Secure containerized execution environment 🔍 Automated QA Agent Implementation - FileSurfer for configuration validation - WebSurfer for webhook endpoint testing - Coder agent for test script generation - ComputerTerminal for CLI automation ⚡ QA Workflow Integration - Automated test suite generation - End-to-end testing scenarios - Performance benchmarking automation - Regression testing workflows 🛡️ Safety and Monitoring - Container isolation protocols - Comprehensive logging and monitoring - Human oversight and access restrictions - Prompt injection protection Benefits: - Autonomous testing and validation of hooks system - Comprehensive QA coverage with minimal manual effort - Integration with existing Codex testing infrastructure - Advanced multi-agent coordination for complex test scenarios - Safety-first approach with proper isolation and monitoring
- Add Phase 9: Comprehensive E2E Testing as dedicated testing phase - Expand Phase 6.3 with detailed E2E testing scenarios - Enhance Phase 8.3 with comprehensive Magentic-One E2E workflows - Split Phase 9 between both developers (backend/frontend portions) - Update progress tracking to reflect enhanced testing coverage Enhanced E2E Testing Coverage: 🧪 Phase 6.3: Traditional E2E Tests (Developer A) - Complete hook workflows testing (6 scenarios) - Integration testing with existing Codex (5 scenarios) - Cross-platform E2E testing (4 environments) - Real-world scenario testing (5 scenarios) - Performance and security E2E (4 scenarios) 🤖 Phase 8.3: AI-Powered E2E with Magentic-One (Developer B) - Automated test suite generation (4 capabilities) - Hook configuration validation automation (4 validations) - Multi-agent E2E testing scenarios (5 scenarios) - Performance benchmarking automation (4 capabilities) - Regression testing workflows (4 workflows) 🎭 Phase 9: Comprehensive E2E Testing (Both Developers) - Playwright E2E test suite for CLI (5 tests) - Real-world integration testing (5 scenarios) - Cross-environment E2E validation (5 environments) Total E2E Coverage: - 24 traditional E2E test scenarios - 21 AI-powered automated E2E workflows - 15 comprehensive cross-environment tests - 60+ individual E2E test cases across all phases Benefits: - Comprehensive coverage of all hook functionality - Both manual and automated testing approaches - Cross-platform and cross-environment validation - Real-world scenario testing with actual services - AI-powered test generation and execution - Continuous regression testing capabilities
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR implements a comprehensive lifecycle hooks system for Codex, enabling external scripts, webhooks, and integrations to be triggered at specific points in the Codex execution lifecycle.
What's Implemented
✅ Phase 1.1: Hook Type Definitions and Core Types
LifecycleEventenum with 12 event types covering all major Codex lifecycle points✅ Phase 1.2: Hook Registry System
Key Features
Lifecycle Events
The system supports hooks for all major Codex lifecycle points:
Hook Types
Configuration Example
Advanced Features
Conditional Execution
Priority Management
Template Substitution
Architecture
The hooks system is built around these core components:
Integration
Testing
Files Added/Modified
New Files
TODO.md- Comprehensive implementation roadmapcodex-rs/core/src/hooks/mod.rs- Main hooks modulecodex-rs/core/src/hooks/types.rs- Core type definitionscodex-rs/core/src/hooks/context.rs- Hook execution contextcodex-rs/core/src/hooks/config.rs- Configuration parsingcodex-rs/core/src/hooks/registry.rs- Hook registry implementationcodex-rs/core/src/hooks/manager.rs- Hook managercodex-rs/core/src/hooks/executor.rs- Hook execution frameworkModified Files
codex-rs/core/Cargo.toml- Added dependencies (chrono, tempfile, async-trait)codex-rs/core/src/lib.rs- Added hooks module exportcodex-rs/core/src/config.rs- Integrated hooks configurationNext Steps
This PR completes Phase 1 of the lifecycle hooks implementation. The next phases will include:
Breaking Changes
None. This is a purely additive feature that doesn't affect existing functionality.
Performance Impact
Minimal. The hooks system is designed to be:
Ready for Review: This PR establishes a solid foundation for the lifecycle hooks system with comprehensive type safety, configuration management, and extensibility.
Pull Request opened by Augment Code with guidance from the PR author