Merged
Conversation
PhilippBach
approved these changes
May 22, 2025
Member
PhilippBach
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for opening the PR. This looks good to me. I think that really makes sense to align the standard errors and the confidence intervals in the standard summary
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updating the variance aggregation over multiple repetitions.
The aggregated variance is now based on the median aggregation of the confidence intervals. The confidence interval aggregation is based on Generic Machine Learning Inference on Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Randomized Experiments, with an Application to Immunization in India.
Aggregation is now simplified and does not require variance scaling.
PR Checklist
Please fill out this PR checklist (see our contributing guidelines for details).