Added checks to identify cause of segfault exposed in #2748 #2750
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… moved (un)doReformulation, handleInfiniteCost and restoreInfiniteCost to it
…size() as number of nonzeros; formatted
Member
Author
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In
highsSparseTranspose, now usingAstart[numCol]rather thanAindex.size()as number of nonzeros.In debug, calling
HPresolve::checkCSCfromHPresolve::toCSCto make sure that CSC index and value are of the correct size, that the entries of index are in bounds, and that there there are no explicit zeros in value arrays. No reason to suspect that anything is wrong, but what might be causing the segfault exposed in #2748?