Skip to content

Conversation

@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

@ekluzek ekluzek commented Dec 4, 2025

Description of changes

Just updates to the cime branch that fixes the check_input_data --download issue.

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any: @jedwards4b

CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #):

Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? No

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? No

Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? No No

Testing performed, if any: Tried check_input_data --download on Izumi on the Ciso answer changing branch to show it could successfully retrieve the missing carbon isotope files

@ekluzek ekluzek added this to the cesm3_0_beta08 milestone Dec 4, 2025
@ekluzek ekluzek self-assigned this Dec 4, 2025
@ekluzek ekluzek added enhancement new capability or improved behavior of existing capability bfb bit-for-bit usability Improve or clarify user-facing options labels Dec 4, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Ready to start (or start again) in CTSM: Upcoming tags Dec 4, 2025
@ekluzek ekluzek moved this from Ready to start (or start again) to In progress - b4b-dev in CTSM: Upcoming tags Dec 4, 2025
@ekluzek ekluzek added the priority: high High priority to fix/merge soon, e.g., because it is a problem in important configurations label Jan 7, 2026
@ekluzek ekluzek moved this from Todo to In Progress in LMWG: Sprint Planning Board Jan 7, 2026
@wwieder
Copy link
Contributor

wwieder commented Jan 15, 2026

@ekluzek this has a beta08 milestone. Is that still the correct timeline?

Use the cime tag now that the PR was merged
@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ekluzek commented Jan 15, 2026

@wwieder not a thing critical to get in for beta08, but something we do need to soon, because it does cause problems with new files in inputdata. So for someone running on other machines besides Derecho and Izumi.

@ekluzek ekluzek requested a review from slevis-lmwg January 16, 2026 18:23
@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ekluzek commented Jan 16, 2026

I ran the testing here, and it's as expected. b4b-dev had a fieldlist difference already in place that I saw. NEON tests had a glitch downloading data, but that was it.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In progress - b4b-dev to In progress - master in CTSM: Upcoming tags Jan 16, 2026
@ekluzek ekluzek merged commit d42e9df into ESCOMP:b4b-dev Jan 16, 2026
4 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In progress - master to Done (non release/external) in CTSM: Upcoming tags Jan 16, 2026
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in LMWG: Sprint Planning Board Jan 16, 2026
@ekluzek ekluzek deleted the cime_download_update branch January 16, 2026 18:37
@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg mentioned this pull request Jan 22, 2026
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bfb bit-for-bit enhancement new capability or improved behavior of existing capability priority: high High priority to fix/merge soon, e.g., because it is a problem in important configurations usability Improve or clarify user-facing options

Projects

Status: Done (non release/external)
Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants