Skip to content

b4b: Documentation changes for issue #3722 (dewpoint temperature restriction on bare ground dew flux)#3736

Merged
ekluzek merged 4 commits intoESCOMP:b4b-devfrom
olyson:docs-I3722
Mar 12, 2026
Merged

b4b: Documentation changes for issue #3722 (dewpoint temperature restriction on bare ground dew flux)#3736
ekluzek merged 4 commits intoESCOMP:b4b-devfrom
olyson:docs-I3722

Conversation

@olyson
Copy link
Contributor

@olyson olyson commented Feb 3, 2026

Description of changes

Add documentation for dewpoint temperature restriction on bare ground dew flux

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any: None

CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #):
Resolves #3722
Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? No

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? No

Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? Yes. Yes.

Testing performed, if any:
Built and viewed documentation locally.

@olyson olyson added this to the cesm3.0.0 release branch tag milestone Feb 3, 2026
@olyson olyson requested a review from slevis-lmwg February 3, 2026 19:56
@olyson olyson added next this should get some attention in the next week or two. Normally each Thursday SE meeting. bfb bit-for-bit size: small docs-loc:tech-note Relates to Technical Note (science) labels Feb 3, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @olyson! I did not go to the code to confirm the accuracy of the equations, but nothing stood out as an obvious (to me) mistake, so I'm approving.

I noticed that you presented the new equations without saying anything about how this changes dew formation. Is dew formation explained anywhere? Is the connection to dew formation too tenuous to draw the link explicitly? Mainly I'm curious, and I'm fine with whatever you decide.

@olyson
Copy link
Contributor Author

olyson commented Feb 3, 2026

Thanks @olyson! I did not go to the code to confirm the accuracy of the equations, but nothing stood out as an obvious (to me) mistake, so I'm approving.

I noticed that you presented the new equations without saying anything about how this changes dew formation. Is dew formation explained anywhere? Is the connection to dew formation too tenuous to draw the link explicitly? Mainly I'm curious, and I'm fine with whatever you decide.

Actually, yes, that is a good idea. I will ex;plicitly link this to the RRTMGP error issue with a comment.

@olyson
Copy link
Contributor Author

olyson commented Feb 3, 2026

@slevis-lmwg , I have added the comment and fixed the numbering.

@wwieder
Copy link
Contributor

wwieder commented Feb 5, 2026

@samsrabin can you bring this to b4b-dev?

@wwieder wwieder removed the next this should get some attention in the next week or two. Normally each Thursday SE meeting. label Feb 5, 2026
@wwieder
Copy link
Contributor

wwieder commented Mar 3, 2026

@samsrabin can you bring this to b4b-dev?

Not urgent, but wanted to ping this so it's on your radar @samsrabin

@samsrabin samsrabin moved this to Todo in CLM documentation Mar 4, 2026
@ekluzek ekluzek changed the title Documentation changes for issue #3722 (dewpoint temperature restriction on bare ground dew flux) b4b: Documentation changes for issue #3722 (dewpoint temperature restriction on bare ground dew flux) Mar 12, 2026
Copy link
Collaborator

@ekluzek ekluzek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me as well @olyson. Since, this is UG documentation with working doc builds, I see no reason to not bring it in. So I'll merge it now.

@ekluzek ekluzek merged commit e57b5bc into ESCOMP:b4b-dev Mar 12, 2026
6 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Done in CLM documentation Mar 12, 2026
@ekluzek ekluzek deleted the docs-I3722 branch March 12, 2026 20:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bfb bit-for-bit docs-loc:tech-note Relates to Technical Note (science) size: small

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants