-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Potential priority fix #274
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @CitralFlo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses a potential logical error in how the highest priority WorldGuard region is identified. By switching from finding the minimum priority to the maximum priority, the system will now correctly select the region intended to have precedence when multiple regions overlap, ensuring proper application of region-specific rules.
Highlights
- WorldGuard Region Priority Logic: The logic for determining the 'highest priority region' in WorldGuard has been corrected to correctly identify the region with the numerically highest priority value, rather than the lowest.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request correctly fixes a bug in highestPriorityRegion
by changing from min()
to max()
to find the WorldGuard region with the highest priority. This is the correct approach as higher integer values represent higher priority in WorldGuard. I have added one suggestion to further improve the code by using Optional
more idiomatically, which will enhance code safety and readability.
@Nullable | ||
private ProtectedRegion highestPriorityRegion(ApplicableRegionSet applicableRegions) { | ||
return applicableRegions.getRegions().stream() | ||
.min(Comparator.comparingInt(ProtectedRegion::getPriority)) | ||
.max(Comparator.comparingInt(ProtectedRegion::getPriority)) | ||
.orElse(null); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This method can be improved by returning an Optional<ProtectedRegion>
instead of using @Nullable
. This change aligns with modern Java best practices for handling potentially absent values, making the code safer by leveraging the type system to enforce checks for presence and eliminating the risk of NullPointerException
from an unchecked null
return. It also enables callers, such as the getRegion
method, to use a more fluent and declarative style with Optional
chaining.
private Optional<ProtectedRegion> highestPriorityRegion(ApplicableRegionSet applicableRegions) {
return applicableRegions.getRegions().stream()
.max(Comparator.comparingInt(ProtectedRegion::getPriority));
}
Current priority finds the lowest priority instead of highest