Add more NEF compression details

[kmilos]

Found in newer Z bodies, as reported by exiftool

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2055 (8dddc6e) into main (55712d4) will decrease coverage by 55.76%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 8dddc6e differs from pull request most recent head 7804e10. Consider uploading reports for the commit 7804e10 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #2055       +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   61.48%   5.72%   -55.77%     
==========================================
  Files          96      96               
  Lines       19207   18955      -252     
  Branches     9843    9843               
==========================================
- Hits        11810    1085    -10725     
- Misses       5080   17682    +12602     
+ Partials     2317     188     -2129     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/nikonmn_int.cpp	0.00% <ø> (-46.77%)	⬇️
src/getopt.hpp	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
src/actions.hpp	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
src/exiv2app.hpp	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
src/fujimn_int.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
src/orfimage_int.hpp	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
src/rw2image_int.hpp	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
include/exiv2/exif.hpp	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
include/exiv2/iptc.hpp	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
include/exiv2/tags.hpp	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
... and 80 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 55712d4...7804e10. Read the comment docs.

[piponazo]

Looks fine to me. I would only add a comment indicating where the reader can find more information about those different options.

Actually In this page from exiftool I see some values that are not added here (5, 7, 8):
https://exiftool.org/TagNames/Nikon.html#NEFCompression

Why are you not adding those ones?

[kmilos]

Thanks for taking a look. Actually we got stuck at synchronizing the labels in exiftool/exiftool#117

[neheb]

Needs a rebase

[kmilos]

Actually, there is an unknown data struct behind a new MakerNote tag we don't support yet where these new values (13 & 14) come into play, hence the draft status... And there has been no conclusion of exiftool/exiftool#117 either.