Skip to content

Part 1: Remove Onyx.connect() for the key: ONYXKEYS.PERSONAL_DETAILS_LIST in src/libs/actions/Report.ts#77636

Open
lorretheboy wants to merge 24 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
lorretheboy:fix-part-01/73656
Open

Part 1: Remove Onyx.connect() for the key: ONYXKEYS.PERSONAL_DETAILS_LIST in src/libs/actions/Report.ts#77636
lorretheboy wants to merge 24 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
lorretheboy:fix-part-01/73656

Conversation

@lorretheboy
Copy link
Contributor

@lorretheboy lorretheboy commented Dec 14, 2025

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #73656
PROPOSAL: #73656 (comment)

Tests

Test 1:

  1. Login to ND
  2. Open expense chat
  3. Open WS chat
  4. Verify that Create report flow works well
  5. Verify that Create expense flow works well
  6. Go to Report details
  7. Verify that Report details show properly

Test 2 (Only for native device IOS, Android):

  1. Open report from deeplink
  2. Verify that we can open it and the report data is shown properly
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

Same as Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
ANDROID.mov
Screen.Recording.2025-12-14.at.21.52.37.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
WEBSITE.ANDROID.mov
iOS: Native
ios_0AQlQiwu.mp4
Screen.Recording.2025-12-14.at.21.50.05.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
WEBSITE.IOS.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
WEBSITE.mov

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 14, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/CONST/index.ts 87.50% <ø> (ø)
.../Search/SearchPageHeader/SearchPageHeaderInput.tsx 36.89% <50.00%> (+0.33%) ⬆️
src/libs/actions/Link.ts 23.31% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pages/NewChatPage.tsx 75.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pages/Search/SearchMoneyRequestReportPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/components/PromotedActionsBar.tsx 36.36% <0.00%> (ø)
...rc/components/Search/SearchRouter/SearchRouter.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pages/Share/ShareDetailsPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pages/ProfilePage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pages/NewChatConfirmPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 1 more
... and 11 files with indirect coverage changes

@lorretheboy lorretheboy marked this pull request as ready for review December 14, 2025 13:58
@lorretheboy lorretheboy requested review from a team as code owners December 14, 2025 13:58
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 14, 2025

@parasharrajat Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from a team and grgia and removed request for a team December 14, 2025 13:58
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 14, 2025

@grgia Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

const [isSearchingForReports] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.IS_SEARCHING_FOR_REPORTS, {initWithStoredValues: false, canBeMissing: true});
const [reportAttributesDerived] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.DERIVED.REPORT_ATTRIBUTES, {canBeMissing: true, selector: reportsSelector});
const selectionListRef = useRef<SelectionListHandle | null>(null);
const [allPersonalDetails] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.PERSONAL_DETAILS_LIST, {canBeMissing: true});
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

use personalDetails hook instead.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

Copy link
Contributor

@grgia grgia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lorretheboy would you ping when tests are passing

const transactionThreadReportID = getOneTransactionThreadReportID(report, chatReport, reportActions ?? [], isOffline, reportTransactionIDs);
const oneTransactionID = reportTransactions.at(0)?.transactionID;

const [personalDetails] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.PERSONAL_DETAILS_LIST, {canBeMissing: true});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we use the hook here too

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

According to [PERF-3] Use OnyxListItemProvider hooks instead of useOnyx in renderItem, we should use the hook if it is inside the render list of a flatlist. So I think we dont need it for this case. Wdyt?
image

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @grgia has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #77636.

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
⏩ SKIPPED ⏩ ⏩ SKIPPED ⏩
The build for Android was skipped The build for iOS was skipped
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
⏩ SKIPPED ⏩ https://77636.pr-testing.expensify.com
The build for Desktop was skipped Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

Copy link
Contributor

@JmillsExpensify JmillsExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No product review required.

Copy link
Contributor

@grgia grgia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lorretheboy would you please merge main so it's up to date with latest, since it's been a few weeks during the holidays 🙇

@lorretheboy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merged main

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Bump @lorretheboy

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Jan 12, 2026

what's the latest here @lorretheboy

@lorretheboy
Copy link
Contributor Author

@parasharrajat @grgia It is ready for re-review now. Thxx for waiting

})) ?? [];

const ownerAccountID = report.ownerAccountID;
if (ownerAccountID && personalDetails?.[ownerAccountID]) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you should pass reportOwnerPersonalDetails in a different param not in participants.

undefined,
undefined,
);
const participants: ParticipantInfo[] =
Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat Jan 12, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When I asked to pass personaldetails of participants and owner as param. I also meant that instead of subscribing to whole ONYXKEYS.PERSONAL_DETAILS_LIST collection, we should only subscribe to participants and owner user's personal details.

So you should update the logic to use a selector in following subscription which filters the personal details for necessary users only.

If we can't create selector dynamically at some places then we should use the personalDetails hook instead.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

bump @lorretheboy

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

@lorretheboy Let us know when this is ready again.

@lorretheboy
Copy link
Contributor Author

It is ready for review last week. Sorry I forgot to ping you. It's now conflict again, lemme resolve it

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

@lorretheboy More Conflicts.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

@lorretheboy Conflicts.

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we use const personalDetails = usePersonalDetails(); hook instead where possible?

Comment on lines +149 to +157
displayReport.participantsList
?.filter((u) => u.accountID !== personalDetail.accountID)
.map((u) => ({
login: u.login ?? '',
accountID: u.accountID,
personalDetails: personalDetails?.[u.accountID] ?? undefined,
})) ?? [];

const ownerPersonalDetails = report?.ownerAccountID && personalDetails?.[report?.ownerAccountID] ? personalDetails[report?.ownerAccountID] : undefined;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess there is no use of this now as we are already subscribing to whole personaldetails collection....

As per my previous comment, we can't use the selector pattern now. Do you still see any benefit of passing only participants and owner personal details.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lorretheboy Can you check this?

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Bump @lorretheboy. I am ready to close this fast, but if you handlethe requested changes in a timely manner.

@lorretheboy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can we use const personalDetails = usePersonalDetails(); hook instead where possible?

Done. The current code is following this documentation

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants