Skip to content

Conversation

@ikevin127
Copy link
Contributor

@ikevin127 ikevin127 commented Jan 7, 2026

Explanation of Change

UX Flow

  • Admin navigates to Workspace > Travel for a given workspace.
  • If the domain + workspace is Travel‑enabled and the Travel Invoicing beta flag is present, we render a “Travel Invoicing” section on the page.
  • If Travel Invoicing is not available (wrong region, missing feed, no beta), the section is hidden.

Data & Onyx

  • Read the policy via useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.POLICY) using the policyID from route params.
  • Use small pure selectors (new helpers in a TravelInvoicingUtils module) to derive:
    • getIsTravelInvoicingEnabled(policyID) – checks whether the PROGRAM_TRAVEL_US feed in private_expensifyCardSettings is enabled.
    • hasTravelInvoicingSettlementAccount(policy) – checks for a configured settlement account for that feed.
    • getTravelLimit(policy) – reads the limit value associated with the Travel feed.
    • getTravelSpend(policy) – reads the current period spent for the Travel feed (or from a separate travel‑spend Onyx key provided by the backend).
    • getTravelSettlementAccount(policy) – returns the display name / last 4 of the bank account.
    • getTravelSettlementFrequency(policy) – returns the backend frequency value (e.g., monthly, weekly).

Components & reuse

  • New section component: WorkspaceTravelInvoicingSection, implemented alongside the existing workspace settings pages (e.g. WorkspaceCardPage and WorkspaceBillsPage) and rendered within WorkspaceTravelPage.
  • This section:
    • Reuses layout and styling from the existing workspace card section (WorkspaceCardSection) where possible (header row with toggle, summary “card” layout, sub‑rows for configuration).
    • Internally uses generic primitives like Section, MenuItem, FormWrapper, etc., consistent with other Workspace pages.

Actions

  • No actions are called on initial render; we only read Onyx.
  • Any refresh of the policy object (to pick up backend state changes) follows existing patterns (e.g., calling an existing Policy.open / Policy.fetch action when coming back from a setup flow).

Testing
We’ll create a new test file called WorkspaceTravelInvoicingSectionText.tsx that will test the following cases:

  • When a policy has no Travel Invoicing feed or no beta flag, the section does not render
  • When the feed exists and the beta is on, the section header + toggle render, with “on”/”off” state derived from getIsTravelInvoicingEnabled(policyID).

Fixed Issues

$ #78673
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Right now - locally - in order to verify the new page UI - one can edit / comment out two blocks of code to be able to see the new section in Workspace Settings > Travel, see diff below.

Code diff
diff --git a/src/pages/workspace/travel/PolicyTravelPage.tsx b/src/pages/workspace/travel/PolicyTravelPage.tsx
index d40bc2682fd..f024973df16 100644
--- a/src/pages/workspace/travel/PolicyTravelPage.tsx
+++ b/src/pages/workspace/travel/PolicyTravelPage.tsx
@@ -46,17 +46,18 @@ function WorkspaceTravelPage({
     const step = getTravelStep(policy, travelSettings, isBetaEnabled(CONST.BETAS.IS_TRAVEL_VERIFIED), policies, currentUserLogin);
 
     const mainContent = (() => {
-        switch (step) {
-            case CONST.TRAVEL.STEPS.BOOK_OR_MANAGE_YOUR_TRIP:
-                if (isTravelInvoicingEnabled) {
-                    return <WorkspaceTravelInvoicingSection policyID={policyID} />;
-                }
-                return <BookOrManageYourTrip policyID={policyID} />;
-            case CONST.TRAVEL.STEPS.REVIEWING_REQUEST:
-                return <ReviewingRequest />;
-            default:
-                return <GetStartedTravel policyID={policyID} />;
-        }
+        return <WorkspaceTravelInvoicingSection policyID={policyID} />;
+        // switch (step) {
+        //     case CONST.TRAVEL.STEPS.BOOK_OR_MANAGE_YOUR_TRIP:
+        //         if (isTravelInvoicingEnabled) {
+        //             return <WorkspaceTravelInvoicingSection policyID={policyID} />;
+        //         }
+        //         return <BookOrManageYourTrip policyID={policyID} />;
+        //     case CONST.TRAVEL.STEPS.REVIEWING_REQUEST:
+        //         return <ReviewingRequest />;
+        //     default:
+        //         return <GetStartedTravel policyID={policyID} />;
+        // }
     })();
 
     return (
diff --git a/src/pages/workspace/travel/WorkspaceTravelInvoicingSection.tsx b/src/pages/workspace/travel/WorkspaceTravelInvoicingSection.tsx
index d0bb2ec87ca..8b65df8c5ff 100644
--- a/src/pages/workspace/travel/WorkspaceTravelInvoicingSection.tsx
+++ b/src/pages/workspace/travel/WorkspaceTravelInvoicingSection.tsx
@@ -167,9 +167,9 @@ function WorkspaceTravelInvoicingSection({policyID}: WorkspaceTravelInvoicingSec
 
     // If Travel Invoicing is not enabled or no settlement account is configured
     // show the BookOrManageYourTrip component as fallback
-    if (!isTravelInvoicingEnabled || !hasSettlementAccount) {
-        return <BookOrManageYourTrip policyID={policyID} />;
-    }
+    // if (!isTravelInvoicingEnabled || !hasSettlementAccount) {
+    //     return <BookOrManageYourTrip policyID={policyID} />;
+    // }
 
     return (
         <>

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

N/A

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

MacOS: Chrome

Screenshot 2026-01-17 at 11 29 41

iOS: HybridApp

Closed Open
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 Pro Max - 2026-01-17 at 11 33 33 Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 Pro Max - 2026-01-17 at 11 33 25

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 7, 2026

Hey, I noticed you changed src/languages/en.ts in a PR from a fork. For security reasons, translations are not generated automatically for PRs from forks.

If you want to automatically generate translations for other locales, an Expensify employee will have to:

  1. Look at the code and make sure there are no malicious changes.
  2. Run the Generate static translations GitHub workflow. If you have write access and the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Alternatively, if you are an external contributor, you can run the translation script locally with your own OpenAI API key. To learn more, try running:

npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --help

Typically, you'd want to translate only what you changed by running npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --compare-ref main

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 7, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/CONST/index.ts 85.59% <ø> (+1.69%) ⬆️
src/components/Icon/chunks/illustrations.chunk.ts 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/components/MenuItem.tsx 87.12% <100.00%> (ø)
src/libs/API/types.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/libs/TravelInvoicingUtils.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...rkspace/travel/CentralInvoicingSubtitleWrapper.tsx 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ages/workspace/travel/CentralInvoicingLearnHow.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...rkspace/travel/WorkspaceTravelInvoicingSection.tsx 96.00% <96.00%> (ø)
src/libs/actions/TravelInvoicing.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pages/workspace/travel/PolicyTravelPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 31 files with indirect coverage changes

@ikevin127 ikevin127 marked this pull request as ready for review January 9, 2026 01:49
@ikevin127 ikevin127 requested review from a team as code owners January 9, 2026 01:49
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from heyjennahay and parasharrajat and removed request for a team January 9, 2026 01:49
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 9, 2026

@parasharrajat Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team January 9, 2026 01:49
@dubielzyk-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

On mobile the top card doesn't have the correct padding. It still looks like it's 32px instead of 20px. Bottom card is fine though:

CleanShot 2026-01-09 at 11 57 26@2x

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. Please add Manual Test steps to test the newly added section in the App.

@ikevin127
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blimpich What do you suggest we do for this PR in terms of manual test steps, I didn't add any and added [NoQA] because this being Travel Invoicing - Release 2.1: Opening the Travel Invoicing Page and having this in the docs:

Testing
We’ll create a new test file called WorkspaceTravelInvoicingSectionText.tsx that will test the following cases:

  • When a policy has no Travel Invoicing feed or no beta flag, the section does not render
  • When the feed exists and the beta is on, the section header + toggle render, with “on”/”off” state derived from getIsTravelInvoicingEnabled(policyID).

Which means we're basically not even showing the new section:

Screenshot 2026-01-08 at 17 32 38

unless Travel Invoicing feed and beta are both existing / ON - otherwise we're showing whatever was being shown before aka this (which is noop):

Screenshot 2026-01-09 at 12 57 30

We're doing this because BE is not ready yet and I want to be able to have this PR merged for when BE is ready for next stages of the release.

@blimpich
Copy link
Contributor

blimpich commented Jan 9, 2026

@parasharrajat I don't think we need manual testing here since this is all behind a beta. Manual testing can come later once we start gluing everything together and testing the feature end to end

@ikevin127
Copy link
Contributor Author

On mobile the top card doesn't have the correct padding. It still looks like it's 32px instead of 20px.

✅ Addressed.

Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 Pro Max - 2026-01-09 at 13 26 20

I don't think we need manual testing here since this is all behind a beta. Manual testing can come later once we start gluing everything together and testing the feature end to end

Agree, I think a design match / code review only would be enough in terms of testing for this PR - as for functionality and unit I already added tests.

@ikevin127 ikevin127 changed the title [NoQA] Feature: Travel Invoicing - Release 2.1: Opening the Travel Invoicing Page [WIP][NoQA] Feature: Travel Invoicing - Release 2.1: Opening the Travel Invoicing Page Jan 9, 2026
@ikevin127
Copy link
Contributor Author

Asked for 🇪🇸 translations verification - awaiting confirmation before I remove [WIP] and ready for merge.

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. Did we add the new beta?

];

const renderOptionItem = (item: ToggleSettingOptionRowProps, index: number) => (
<Section
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Section inside section. May be not needed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Section component is actually needed here for proper layout and styling consistency - after reviewing your feedback about aligning with other pages like WorkspaceWorkflowsPage.tsx, I've made the following improvements:

  1. Added isCentralPane prop to the Section as you suggested - this automatically handles the responsive padding (instead of manually calculating isSmallScreenWidth ? styles.p5 : styles.p8), making the code cleaner and consistent with other workspace pages.
  2. Why Section is still needed: The Section component in renderOptionItem provides the appropriate container styling for the ToggleSettingOptionRow. Looking at WorkspaceWorkflowsPage.tsx, the same pattern is used - ToggleSettingOptionRow components are wrapped in Section containers (see lines ~429-450 where renderOptionItem wraps toggle rows in styled containers).

The Section isn't redundant because:

  • The parent container (WorkspaceTravelInvoicingSection) returns a Fragment (<>...</>), not a Section
  • Each toggle section needs its own padding/styling boundary
  • Using isCentralPane on each Section ensures consistent styling across different screen sizes automatically

The key change is moving from manual padding calculation to using isCentralPane, which is the recommended approach per your suggestion ✅

// pendingAction: policy?.pendingFields?.autoReporting ?? policy?.pendingFields?.autoReportingFrequency,
// errors: getLatestErrorField(policy ?? {}, CONST.POLICY.COLLECTION_KEYS.AUTOREPORTING),
// onCloseError: () => clearPolicyErrorField(route.params.policyID, CONST.POLICY.COLLECTION_KEYS.AUTOREPORTING),
subMenuItems: (
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here may be these needs to be just main menu items not sub menu items. is there a reason for creating submenu items...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, using subMenuItems here is intentional and follows an established pattern in the codebase (see WorkspaceWorkflowsPage.tsx for similar usage).

The key reason is that these items (Current Travel Spend, Current Travel Limit, Settlement Account, Settlement Frequency) are dependent settings of the Central Invoicing toggle - they should only be visible when Central Invoicing is enabled - using subMenuItems with ToggleSettingOptionRow provides this behavior out of the box:

  • when the toggle is ON: sub-items are displayed
  • when the toggle is OFF: sub-items are hidden

If these were rendered as separate main menu items, we would need to manually handle the conditional visibility logic, which would duplicate what ToggleSettingOptionRow already handles internally - the subMenuItems pattern keeps the code cleaner and makes the parent-child relationship explicit.

✅ This is consistent with how other workspace sections handle dependent settings (e.g., the Delayed Submission toggle in Workflows has dependent settings for submission frequency and schedule that use the same pattern).

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then it is fine to keep it this way.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Left some comments. There is not much to review here except code, even though this pr has implementation logic. We will be better off testing it next PR, where we start implementing functionality.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Jan 18, 2026

BUG:Android: iOS: Misaligned Learn how link.
image

@ikevin127

This comment was marked as resolved.

@ikevin127
Copy link
Contributor Author

Did we add the new beta?

✅ Yes, @allgandalf added it in this PR, and it's being used in this PR and the other ones related to travel invoicing.

@ikevin127
Copy link
Contributor Author

BUG:Android: iOS: Misaligned Learn how link.

Good catch!

✅ Addressed all comments and native bug - ready for another review!

@ikevin127
Copy link
Contributor Author

Failing ❌ ESLint not related to this PR.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

ESLint logs are huge. Didn't find what is wrong there... Can you merge main and try to resolve it? I didn't notice it on other PRs today.

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from blimpich January 21, 2026 17:33
@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

We can handle more testing scenarios in the next PRs. This is NoQA.

@blimpich blimpich merged commit 075e33e into Expensify:main Jan 21, 2026
32 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/blimpich in version: 9.3.6-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants