Skip to content

Conversation

@Gonals
Copy link
Contributor

@Gonals Gonals commented Feb 9, 2026

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/596277
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. Log into newDot and go to Wallet

  2. Import a CSV card. You can use this file:
    fake_transactions-2026-01-16 10_56_55.629.csv

  3. Click on the card. You should see an option to add transactions:

Screenshot 2026-01-30 at 12 26 59
  1. click it and follow the process. Use the same file. Confirm the columns get pre-mapped

  2. COnfirm they are also pre-mapped in oldDot

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

Same as tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@Gonals Gonals self-assigned this Feb 9, 2026
@Gonals Gonals requested review from a team as code owners February 9, 2026 16:47
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from truph01 and removed request for a team February 9, 2026 16:47
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 9, 2026

@truph01 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from joekaufmanexpensify and removed request for a team February 9, 2026 16:47
@Gonals Gonals marked this pull request as draft February 9, 2026 17:17

// Optimistically save the column layout for this card (replaces entire entry)
// First clear any existing entry, then set the new one to match backend behavior
optimisticData.push({
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-6 (docs)

The optimistic save of column layout uses two sequential MERGE operations (first setting to null, then setting the new value). If the second merge fails or is interrupted, the column layout will be cleared without a replacement, resulting in data loss.

Reasoning: This pattern is fragile because it creates an intermediate state where data is deleted. If any error occurs between the two operations, the user loses their saved column mappings without a way to recover them.

Suggested fix:
Replace the two-step process with a single atomic operation that overwrites the value directly:

// Optimistically save the column layout for this card (replaces entire entry atomically)
optimisticData.push({
    onyxMethod: Onyx.METHOD.MERGE,
    key: ONYXKEYS.NVP_SAVED_CSV_COLUMN_LAYOUT_LIST,
    value: {[cardID]: columnLayout},
});

Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

return;
}

if (!existingCardID || !spreadsheet?.data || !savedColumnLayouts) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ PERF-6 (docs)

The hasAppliedSavedMappings ref is used to prevent re-running the effect, but this logic could be simplified by deriving whether mappings should be applied directly in the render phase or by structuring dependencies correctly.

Reasoning: Using a ref to track whether an effect has run is a pattern that indicates the dependencies might not be correct. The effect depends on existingCardID, spreadsheet?.data, and savedColumnLayouts, but these are explicitly excluded from dependencies.

Suggested fix:
Consider restructuring to either:

  1. Run the effect only when the specific data needed is available (proper dependency array)
  2. Move the logic outside useEffect if it can be derived synchronously

However, if the intent is truly to run once on mount regardless of prop changes, the current pattern with the ref is acceptable as a mount-only side effect.


Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

dateFormat: null,
accountDetails: {
bank: 'upload',
currency,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-2 (docs)

The string 'upload' is a magic value representing the bank name for CSV imports, but it is not defined as a constant.

Reasoning: The value 'upload' appears to be a special identifier in the oldDot system for CSV-uploaded cards, but using it as a string literal makes it unclear what it represents and prone to typos.

Suggested fix:
Define a constant for this value or reference an existing constant if one exists:

accountDetails: {
    bank: CONST.PERSONAL_CARD.BANK_NAME.CSV, // or create a constant if this does not exist
    currency,
    accountID: cardName,
},

Note: Looking at line 201, CONST.PERSONAL_CARD.BANK_NAME.CSV already exists and is used elsewhere in this file, so this should use that constant instead of the hardcoded string 'upload'.


Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

* @param savedLayout - The saved column layout for this card
* @returns Promise that resolves when column mappings are applied
*/
function applySavedColumnMappings(spreadsheetData: string[][], savedLayout: SavedCSVColumnLayoutData): Promise<void | void[]> {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-6 (docs)

The function returns Promise<void | void[]> but the actual return types are inconsistent. It returns Promise<void> from Promise.resolve() in early returns, but the main path returns the result of Onyx.merge() which may return Promise<void[]>.

Reasoning: This type inconsistency can lead to confusion about what the function returns and makes it harder for consumers to handle the promise correctly.

Suggested fix:
Standardize the return type to always return Promise<void>:

function applySavedColumnMappings(spreadsheetData: string[][], savedLayout: SavedCSVColumnLayoutData): Promise<void> {
    // ... existing code ...
    
    // If we found any matching columns, apply the mappings
    if (Object.keys(columnUpdates).length > 0) {
        return Onyx.merge(ONYXKEYS.IMPORTED_SPREADSHEET, {columns: columnUpdates}).then(() => undefined);
    }

    return Promise.resolve();
}

Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

return;
}

hasAppliedSavedMappings.current = true;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-6 (docs)

The applySavedColumnMappings call is fire-and-forget with no error handling. If the Onyx merge fails, the user will not know that their saved mappings were not applied.

Reasoning: Silent failures in data operations can lead to user confusion. If applying saved mappings fails, the user might wonder why their previously saved column mappings are not being used.

Suggested fix:
Add error handling:

hasAppliedSavedMappings.current = true;
applySavedColumnMappings(spreadsheet.data, savedLayout).catch((error) => {
    console.error('Failed to apply saved column mappings', error);
    // Optionally show a user-facing error message
});

Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 9, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/ONYXKEYS.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/libs/actions/Card.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/components/ImportColumn.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...pages/settings/Wallet/TransactionsImportedPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/libs/actions/ImportSpreadsheet.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/libs/actions/ImportTransactions.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 171 files with indirect coverage changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant