|
28 | 28 | Computer models like Monte Carlo or molecular dynamics / electron- or ion-beam |
29 | 29 | interaction simulations can be used to qualify and (or) quantify the shape of |
30 | 30 | the interaction volume. Results of such simulations can be summary statistics |
31 | | - or single-particle resolved sets of trajectories. |
| 31 | + or single-particle-resolved sets of trajectories. |
32 | 32 |
|
33 | | - Explicit or implicit descriptions are possible. |
| 33 | + Explicit or implicit descriptions of the geometry of this |
| 34 | + interaction volume are possible: |
34 | 35 |
|
35 | 36 | * An implicit description is via a set of electron/specimen interactions |
36 | 37 | represented ideally as trajectory data from the computer simulation. |
37 | | - * An explicit description is via an iso-contour surface using either |
| 38 | + * An explicit description is via iso-contour surface using either |
38 | 39 | a simulation grid or a triangulated surface mesh of the approximated |
39 | 40 | iso-contour surface evaluated at specific threshold values. |
40 | | - Iso-contours could be computed from electron or particle fluxes through |
41 | | - an imaginary control surface (the iso-surface). |
42 | | - Threshold values can be defined by particles passing through a unit control |
43 | | - volume (electrons) or energy-levels (e.g. the case of X-rays). |
44 | | - Details depend on the model. |
| 41 | + Iso-contours could be computed from electron or particle flux through |
| 42 | + an imaginary control surface (the iso-surface) or energy-levels |
| 43 | + (e.g. the case of X-rays). Details depend on the model. |
45 | 44 | * Another explicit description is via theoretical models which may |
46 | 45 | be relevant e.g. for X-ray spectroscopy |
47 | 46 |
|
|
0 commit comments