Update README, ForceGraph component, and configuration files for impr…#1408
Merged
Update README, ForceGraph component, and configuration files for impr…#1408
Conversation
…oved setup and SVG handling
Completed Working on "Code Review"✅ Workflow completed successfully. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Contributor
WalkthroughSetup prerequisites and environment constraints are introduced through Node.js version requirements (20.9.0+), SVG Turbopack build configuration with Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@next.config.js`:
- Around line 11-28: The Turbopack comment incorrectly states that '*.svg?url'
will return file URLs; update the Turbopack block (the turbopack.rules '*.svg'
entry using loaders: ['@svgr/webpack']) to remove the `?url` claim and add a
short note that Turbopack does not support resourceQuery matching (so `?url`
imports will fail), or alternatively switch to a filename convention (e.g.,
`*.url.svg`) and add a rule/condition to exclude those from the SVGR loader so
URL-only SVGs work in both Turbopack and webpack modes; ensure the comment
references the '*.svg' rule and '@svgr/webpack' loader so readers know exactly
which config is affected.
In `@README.md`:
- Line 105: Replace the incorrect npm command in the README bullet "* Build the
node project `npm -i`" with a valid command such as `npm i` or `npm install`;
update the README entry to read "* Build the node project `npm i`" (or `npm
install`) so users have a correct, working install command.
Comment on lines
+11
to
+28
| // Enable Turbopack with SVG handling | ||
| turbopack: { | ||
| rules: { | ||
| // Convert SVG imports to React components using @svgr/webpack | ||
| // This preserves the behavior from the webpack config below | ||
| // | ||
| // Usage: | ||
| // import Logo from './logo.svg' → React component | ||
| // import logoUrl from './logo.svg?url' → string URL (Next.js built-in handling) | ||
| // | ||
| // Note: Turbopack uses Next.js built-in asset handling for ?url query params, | ||
| // so *.svg?url imports will return the file URL instead of a React component | ||
| '*.svg': { | ||
| loaders: ['@svgr/webpack'], | ||
| as: '*.js', | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
# Check if any SVG imports use the ?url query parameter in the codebase
rg -n "\.svg\?url" --type-list | head -20Repository: FalkorDB/falkordb-browser
Length of output: 458
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for .svg?url imports across all file types
rg "\.svg\?url" -g '*.tsx' -g '*.ts' -g '*.jsx' -g '*.js' -g '*.json' --max-count=20Repository: FalkorDB/falkordb-browser
Length of output: 449
🌐 Web query:
Next.js Turbopack SVG asset handling query parameters ?url
💡 Result:
Turbopack (in Next.js) does not currently support webpack-style resourceQuery matching, so patterns like importing icon.svg?url (or ?react) can’t be used to switch between “URL asset” vs “SVGR React component” behavior the way you would with webpack rules. This is a known gap/feature request. [1], [2]
Practical workaround (recommended): use a filename (or folder) convention instead of ?url
Configure SVGR for “most SVGs”, but exclude SVGs you want treated as normal assets by giving them a suffix like *.url.svg (or putting them in a specific folder and matching by path condition).
// next.config.js / next.config.mjs
module.exports = {
turbopack: {
rules: {
"*.svg": {
condition: {
all: [
{ not: { path: "*.url.svg" } }, // these will be treated as normal assets
{ not: "foreign" }, // optional perf optimization
],
},
loaders: ["@svgr/webpack"],
as: "*.js",
},
},
},
}Then:
import Icon from "./icon.svg"→ React component (SVGR)import imgUrl from "./hero.url.svg"→ handled by the default asset pipeline (URL / image usage)
This approach is commonly used because resourceQuery isn’t available in Turbopack yet. [3], [4]
Sources:
[1] Next.js discussion: “Support resourceQuery in Turbopack rules” (GitHub) (github.com)
[2] Next.js discussion referencing inability to do .svg?url split like webpack (GitHub) (github.com)
[3] Stack Overflow answer noting resourceQuery not implemented and suggesting *.url.svg pattern (stackoverflow.com)
[4] Next.js docs on turbopack.rules and condition / {path: ...} matching (nextjs.org)
Citations:
- 1: Support `resourceQuery` in Turbopack `rules` vercel/next.js#67452
- 2: How to use resourceQuery loader options with turbopack? vercel/next.js#65360
- 3: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79153360/configure-turbopack-to-load-svgs-according-to-resource-query/79816583
- 4: https://nextjs.org/docs/pages/api-reference/config/next-config-js/turbopack
Turbopack SVG config has misleading comment about ?url query param handling.
The comment claims Turbopack uses built-in asset handling for *.svg?url imports to return URLs, but Turbopack does not currently support resourceQuery matching (the ?url syntax). This is a known limitation.
If the codebase uses import logoUrl from './logo.svg?url' syntax, it will fail in Turbopack mode. Two options:
- Remove the
?urlmention from the comment and note that query params require webpack mode only. - Adopt a filename convention (e.g.,
import from './logo.url.svg') for both modes, using aconditionrule to exclude*.url.svgfiles from SVGR conversion.
The webpack config's resourceQuery approach works fine for non-Turbopack builds, but the Turbopack section needs clarification or refactoring.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@next.config.js` around lines 11 - 28, The Turbopack comment incorrectly
states that '*.svg?url' will return file URLs; update the Turbopack block (the
turbopack.rules '*.svg' entry using loaders: ['@svgr/webpack']) to remove the
`?url` claim and add a short note that Turbopack does not support resourceQuery
matching (so `?url` imports will fail), or alternatively switch to a filename
convention (e.g., `*.url.svg`) and add a rule/condition to exclude those from
the SVGR loader so URL-only SVGs work in both Turbopack and webpack modes;
ensure the comment references the '*.svg' rule and '@svgr/webpack' loader so
readers know exactly which config is affected.
| **Steps:** | ||
| * Clone the git repository `git clone git@github.com:FalkorDB/falkordb-browser.git` | ||
| * Create .env.local in the clone directory `cp .env.local.template .env.local` | ||
| * Build the node project `npm -i` |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo: npm -i should be npm i or npm install.
npm -i is not a valid command. This will confuse users following the setup instructions.
📝 Proposed fix
-* Build the node project `npm -i`
+* Install dependencies `npm install`📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| * Build the node project `npm -i` | |
| * Install dependencies `npm install` |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@README.md` at line 105, Replace the incorrect npm command in the README
bullet "* Build the node project `npm -i`" with a valid command such as `npm i`
or `npm install`; update the README entry to read "* Build the node project `npm
i`" (or `npm install`) so users have a correct, working install command.
🔒 Trivy Security Scan Results |
![overcut-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1367736?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
- Importance counts: BLOCKER 0, CRITICAL 0, MAJOR 1, MINOR 0, SUGGESTION 0, PRAISE 0 (1 total comment across 1 file).
- Key theme: The new Turbopack SVG configuration depends on
@svgr/webpack, but that loader is not installed anywhere, so the build will fail the first time an SVG import is processed.
Next steps
- Add
@svgr/webpack(and any required peers such as@svgr/core) to the project dependencies so both Turbopack and webpack builds can resolve the loader. - Re-run Turbopack/webpack builds after installing the dependency to confirm SVG handling works as documented.
| // Note: Turbopack uses Next.js built-in asset handling for ?url query params, | ||
| // so *.svg?url imports will return the file URL instead of a React component | ||
| '*.svg': { | ||
| loaders: ['@svgr/webpack'], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[MAJOR]: @svgr/webpack loader is not installed
The new Turbopack rule requires @svgr/webpack, but the package is not declared anywhere in package.json. As soon as Turbopack hits an SVG import, the build will fail because the loader cannot be resolved, so the documented behavior never runs.
Suggestion: Add @svgr/webpack (and the matching @svgr/core peer if needed) to the project dependencies or devDependencies so both Turbopack and fallback webpack builds can resolve the loader.
barakb
approved these changes
Feb 12, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…oved setup and SVG handling
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
Documentation
Chores
Bug Fixes