Skip to content

Conversation

dkaznacheev
Copy link

Tests for #484 (passes in 2.13.0-rc2, fails in 2.13.0-rc1)

@dinomite dinomite self-requested a review August 27, 2021 11:08
Copy link
Member

@dinomite dinomite left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, did you get the CLA signed & sent off?

@dinomite dinomite added this to the 2.13.0 milestone Aug 27, 2021
@dinomite dinomite self-assigned this Aug 27, 2021
@dinomite dinomite added the cla-needed PR looks good (although may also require code review), but CLA needed from submitter label Aug 29, 2021
@dinomite
Copy link
Member

@dkaznacheev would you fill it out and email a scan/photo of the result to info at fasterxml dot com?

https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/blob/master/contributor-agreement.pdf

@k163377
Copy link
Contributor

k163377 commented Dec 9, 2023

#493 appears to be resolved, so this PR is closed.

@k163377 k163377 closed this Dec 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla-needed PR looks good (although may also require code review), but CLA needed from submitter
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants