Skip to content

Conversation

nbauernfeind
Copy link
Member

Fixes #248. @cowtowncoder Is this what you're suggesting in the issue? Tests continue to pass.

@nbauernfeind
Copy link
Member Author

Sorry, I was wrong this does not pass tests. I'll look further.

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

@nbauernfeind It's the first part yes, for recognizing Option as ReferenceType. However, actual serializer/deserializer is still needed, as there are some details that can not be generalized (basically how to create actual value instances, and access contents). For those ,AtomicReferenceSerializer and AtomicReferenceSerializer would be best sources I think.

@nbauernfeind nbauernfeind added this to the 2.7.4 milestone Apr 18, 2016
@nbauernfeind nbauernfeind force-pushed the option branch 2 times, most recently from c889d3f to c2d19ad Compare April 18, 2016 14:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants