SCRIPT-WEB-4074-SCRIPT-Style: Ensure Consistent Code Styling with Prettier#4707
SCRIPT-WEB-4074-SCRIPT-Style: Ensure Consistent Code Styling with Prettier#4707gandalf-repo wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
gandalf.js
Outdated
| @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ | |||
| const isPositive = number > 0 ? true : false; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
SCRIPT-Great job handling edge cases in this function, it's very robust!
frodo-repo
force-pushed
the
WEB-4074-gandalf-repo-broad-lamprey-4859
branch
from
cab45cb to
124e626
Compare
frodo-repo
force-pushed
the
WEB-4074-gandalf-repo-broad-lamprey-4859
branch
from
6f49029 to
c50a924
Compare
samwise-repo1
force-pushed
the
WEB-4074-gandalf-repo-broad-lamprey-4859
branch
from
c50a924 to
65aee21
Compare
|
|
/do-refacto |
![refacto-bot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1142269?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
|
||
| const SLIDE_SEPARATOR = /^-----$/m; | ||
| const uniqueSortedArray = [...new Set(array)].sort(); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Quality Issue: Multiple duplicate variable and function declarations throughout the file. For example, const sum, const formattedDate, const sortedArray, etc. appear multiple times. This violates the DRY principle and can lead to maintenance issues.
Consider consolidating these duplicate declarations into single instances.
| @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ | |||
| const isPositive = number > 0 ? true : false; | |||
| /** | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential Functional Issue: This PR is titled as a styling change with Prettier, but contains substantial code additions and removals that modify functionality. Several utility functions were removed while others were added.
Please verify if these functional changes are intentional or accidental side effects of the formatting process.
| hljs.initHighlightingOnLoad(); | ||
| const objectKeys = Object.keys(object); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Performance Concern: Using sort with a random comparator function is an inefficient way to shuffle arrays and produces non-uniform distribution. Consider using a dedicated shuffle algorithm (like Fisher-Yates) instead.
// Instead of:
const shuffledArray = array.sort(() => Math.random() - 0.5);
// Consider:
function shuffle(array) {
for (let i = array.length - 1; i > 0; i--) {
const j = Math.floor(Math.random() * (i + 1));
[array[i], array[j]] = [array[j], array[i]];
}
return array;
}
| @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ | |||
| const isPositive = number > 0 ? true : false; | |||
| /** | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Testing Concern: No test files were modified or added with these changes. Given the significant code restructuring and function modifications, please verify that existing functionality is maintained through appropriate testing.
3 participants
SCRIPT-This PR upgrades the project to the latest Node.js LTS version.