Skip to content

Conversation

@TabishB
Copy link
Contributor

@TabishB TabishB commented Jan 7, 2026

Summary

  • Archive 5 completed changes to openspec/changes/archive/
  • Delete 5 stale/abandoned changes
  • Sync delta specs to main specs

Archived Changes

Change Schema Specs
opsx-archive-command spec-driven ✓ Synced
add-specs-apply-command spec-driven ✓ Already synced
add-per-change-schema-metadata spec-driven ✓ Already synced
make-apply-instructions-schema-aware spec-driven ✓ Synced
add-agent-schema-selection spec-driven No delta specs

Deleted Stale Changes

Change Reason
add-fingerprinting No tasks, 7 weeks stale
add-scaffold-command 0/7 tasks, 7 weeks stale
add-proposal-frontmatter No tasks, 8 weeks stale
add-interactive-proposal-command No tasks, 8 weeks stale
make-validation-scope-aware 0/8 tasks, 4 months stale

Spec Changes

  • New: openspec/specs/opsx-archive-skill/spec.md
  • Updated: openspec/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
    • Added "Schema Apply Block" requirement
    • Added "Apply Instructions Command" requirement
    • Added scenario for applyRequires in Status JSON output

Test plan

  • Verify openspec list shows only active changes
  • Verify archived changes exist in openspec/changes/archive/
  • Verify main specs updated correctly

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Revert

    • Removed proposed scaffold command feature
    • Removed scope-aware validation feature proposal
  • New Features

    • Added schema-aware apply instructions generation and status reporting with artifact requirement tracking
    • Introduced archive skill for organizing completed changes with date-prefixed naming
    • Enhanced status command with requirement visibility

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Archive 5 completed changes:
- opsx-archive-command (synced specs)
- add-specs-apply-command
- add-per-change-schema-metadata
- make-apply-instructions-schema-aware (synced specs)
- add-agent-schema-selection

Delete 5 stale/abandoned changes:
- add-fingerprinting (no tasks, 7 weeks old)
- add-scaffold-command (0/7 tasks, 7 weeks old)
- add-proposal-frontmatter (no tasks, 8 weeks old)
- add-interactive-proposal-command (no tasks, 8 weeks old)
- make-validation-scope-aware (0/8 tasks, 4 months old)

Sync delta specs to main:
- Add opsx-archive-skill spec (new capability)
- Update cli-artifact-workflow spec with Schema Apply Block and
  Apply Instructions Command requirements
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 7, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR removes documentation for two planned features (scaffold command and scope-aware validation) while adding specification documentation for schema-aware apply instructions and an OPSX archive skill workflow.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Removed Scaffold Command Documentation
openspec/changes/add-scaffold-command/proposal.md, openspec/changes/add-scaffold-command/specs/cli-scaffold/spec.md, openspec/changes/add-scaffold-command/tasks.md
Deleted proposal, specification, and task documentation for the scaffold command feature, including rationale, CLI interface design, template structure, and test plans.
Removed Validation Scope Documentation
openspec/changes/make-validation-scope-aware/proposal.md, openspec/changes/make-validation-scope-aware/specs/cli-validate/spec.md, openspec/changes/make-validation-scope-aware/tasks.md
Deleted proposal, specification, and task documentation for scope-aware validation, including rationale, scope-specific validation logic, and test scenarios.
Schema-Aware Apply Instructions
openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-make-apply-instructions-schema-aware/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md, openspec/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
Added new specification sections defining schema apply block requirements, apply instructions command behavior, and status JSON output with applyRequires field. Replaced "Next Command" requirement with migration guidance.
OPSX Archive Skill
openspec/specs/opsx-archive-skill/spec.md
Created new specification document detailing the archive workflow, including directory structure with date-prefixed naming, completion validation checks, spec synchronization, and error handling for existing archive targets.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    actor User
    participant OPSX Skill
    participant Archive Service
    participant Validation
    participant Spec Sync

    User->>OPSX Skill: /opsx:archive (completed change)
    activate OPSX Skill
    OPSX Skill->>Validation: Check artifact completion
    Validation-->>OPSX Skill: Artifacts status
    OPSX Skill->>Validation: Check task completion
    Validation-->>OPSX Skill: Tasks status
    
    alt Incomplete items
        OPSX Skill->>User: Warn & confirm proceed
        User-->>OPSX Skill: Confirm
    end
    
    OPSX Skill->>Spec Sync: Check delta specs exist
    Spec Sync-->>OPSX Skill: Specs status
    
    alt Specs need sync
        OPSX Skill->>User: Prompt sync
        User-->>OPSX Skill: Confirm sync
        OPSX Skill->>Spec Sync: /opsx:sync execution
    end
    
    OPSX Skill->>Archive Service: Move to YYYY-MM-DD-<change-name>
    activate Archive Service
    Archive Service->>Archive Service: Create archive dir if needed
    Archive Service->>Archive Service: Move change & preserve .openspec.yaml
    Archive Service-->>OPSX Skill: Archive complete
    deactivate Archive Service
    
    OPSX Skill->>User: Success summary (location, sync status, warnings)
    deactivate OPSX Skill
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant CLI
    participant Status Service
    participant Apply Instructions
    participant Schema

    Client->>CLI: openspec status --json
    activate CLI
    CLI->>Status Service: Get change status
    activate Status Service
    Status Service->>Schema: Get schema for change
    Schema-->>Status Service: Schema details
    Status Service->>Status Service: Build applyRequires array
    Status Service-->>CLI: JSON (changeName, schemaName, isComplete, artifacts, applyRequires)
    deactivate Status Service
    deactivate CLI
    
    alt Apply block required & artifacts exist
        Client->>CLI: openspec instructions apply
        activate CLI
        CLI->>Apply Instructions: Generate apply instructions
        activate Apply Instructions
        Apply Instructions->>Schema: Check apply.requires
        Schema-->>Apply Instructions: Required artifacts
        Apply Instructions->>Apply Instructions: Build context & instruction
        Apply Instructions-->>CLI: JSON (contextFiles, instruction, tracks, applyRequires)
        deactivate Apply Instructions
        deactivate CLI
    else Missing required artifacts
        Client->>CLI: openspec instructions apply
        CLI->>Apply Instructions: Generate apply instructions
        Apply Instructions->>Schema: Check apply.requires
        Schema-->>Apply Instructions: Required artifacts list
        Apply Instructions-->>CLI: Block with visibility of missing artifacts
    end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 Archiving dreams and fresh designs,
Old plans shelved, new workflows shine,
Apply with schema's steady hand,
Archive dates in date-prefixed land!
Two features fade, two specs take flight—
OpenSpec's future burns so bright! 🌟

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'chore: archive completed changes and clean up stale ones' accurately summarizes the PR's main actions: archiving 5 completed changes and deleting 5 stale ones. It is concise, clear, and reflects the primary changes.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom Pre-merge checks in the settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@vibe-kanban-cloud
Copy link

Review Complete

Your review story is ready!

View Story

Comment !reviewfast on this PR to re-generate the story.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
openspec/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md (1)

4-4: Replace TBD placeholder with actual Purpose section.

The Purpose section contains a TODO comment that should be completed before release. Provide a clear, concise purpose statement for the cli-artifact-workflow specification.

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @openspec/specs/opsx-archive-skill/spec.md:
- Around line 1-3: Add an h2 heading between the existing H1 "OPSX Archive Skill
Spec" and the H3 "### Requirement" (for example "## Overview" or "## Purpose")
so the document follows proper markdown hierarchy; insert the chosen H2
immediately after the title and before the "### Requirement: OPSX Archive Skill"
section to restore the expected heading structure.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
openspec/specs/opsx-archive-skill/spec.md (1)

37-37: Minor: Consider conciseness in status message.

Line 37 uses "proceed without warning"; consider shorter alternatives like "proceed silently" or "skip warning" for brevity.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cd172a4 and b0d46e1.

📒 Files selected for processing (27)
  • openspec/changes/add-scaffold-command/proposal.md
  • openspec/changes/add-scaffold-command/specs/cli-scaffold/spec.md
  • openspec/changes/add-scaffold-command/tasks.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-add-agent-schema-selection/proposal.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-add-agent-schema-selection/tasks.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-add-per-change-schema-metadata/design.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-add-per-change-schema-metadata/proposal.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-add-per-change-schema-metadata/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-add-per-change-schema-metadata/tasks.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-add-specs-apply-command/.openspec.yaml
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-add-specs-apply-command/design.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-add-specs-apply-command/proposal.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-add-specs-apply-command/specs/specs-sync-skill/spec.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-add-specs-apply-command/tasks.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-make-apply-instructions-schema-aware/proposal.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-make-apply-instructions-schema-aware/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-make-apply-instructions-schema-aware/tasks.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-opsx-archive-command/.openspec.yaml
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-opsx-archive-command/design.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-opsx-archive-command/proposal.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-opsx-archive-command/specs/opsx-archive-skill/spec.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-opsx-archive-command/tasks.md
  • openspec/changes/make-validation-scope-aware/proposal.md
  • openspec/changes/make-validation-scope-aware/specs/cli-validate/spec.md
  • openspec/changes/make-validation-scope-aware/tasks.md
  • openspec/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
  • openspec/specs/opsx-archive-skill/spec.md
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (6)
  • openspec/changes/add-scaffold-command/tasks.md
  • openspec/changes/make-validation-scope-aware/tasks.md
  • openspec/changes/make-validation-scope-aware/specs/cli-validate/spec.md
  • openspec/changes/make-validation-scope-aware/proposal.md
  • openspec/changes/add-scaffold-command/proposal.md
  • openspec/changes/add-scaffold-command/specs/cli-scaffold/spec.md
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
openspec/specs/**/spec.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (openspec/AGENTS.md)

Use SHALL/MUST for normative requirements in spec files; avoid should/may unless intentionally non-normative

Files:

  • openspec/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
  • openspec/specs/opsx-archive-skill/spec.md
openspec/changes/**/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (openspec/AGENTS.md)

Scaffold proposal using proposal.md, tasks.md, optional design.md, and delta specs under openspec/changes/<id>/

Files:

  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-make-apply-instructions-schema-aware/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
openspec/changes/**/specs/**/spec.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (openspec/AGENTS.md)

openspec/changes/**/specs/**/spec.md: Use ## ADDED|MODIFIED|REMOVED|RENAMED Requirements headers in spec delta files
Include at least one #### Scenario: per requirement in spec delta files
Use #### Scenario: Name format (4 hashtags) for scenario headers, not bullets or bold text
Use ## ADDED Requirements for new orthogonal capabilities that can stand alone; use ## MODIFIED Requirements for behavior changes of existing requirements
When using MODIFIED Requirements, paste the full requirement block including header and all scenarios

Files:

  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-make-apply-instructions-schema-aware/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
🧠 Learnings (12)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: CR
Repo: Fission-AI/OpenSpec PR: 0
File: openspec/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learning: Use `openspec archive <change-id> --skip-specs --yes` for tooling-only changes
Learnt from: CR
Repo: Fission-AI/OpenSpec PR: 0
File: openspec/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learning: Applies to openspec/changes/**/*.md : Scaffold proposal using `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, optional `design.md`, and delta specs under `openspec/changes/<id>/`
Learnt from: CR
Repo: Fission-AI/OpenSpec PR: 0
File: openspec/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learning: Move completed changes from `changes/[name]/` to `changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-[name]/` after deployment
Learnt from: CR
Repo: Fission-AI/OpenSpec PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T01:08:02.839Z
Learning: Use `@/openspec/AGENTS.md` to learn how to create and apply change proposals, spec format and conventions, and project structure and guidelines
📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: Fission-AI/OpenSpec PR: 0
File: openspec/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learning: Applies to openspec/changes/**/specs/**/spec.md : Include at least one `#### Scenario:` per requirement in spec delta files

Applied to files:

  • openspec/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-make-apply-instructions-schema-aware/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: Fission-AI/OpenSpec PR: 0
File: openspec/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learning: Applies to openspec/changes/**/specs/**/spec.md : Use `## ADDED Requirements` for new orthogonal capabilities that can stand alone; use `## MODIFIED Requirements` for behavior changes of existing requirements

Applied to files:

  • openspec/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-make-apply-instructions-schema-aware/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: Fission-AI/OpenSpec PR: 0
File: openspec/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learning: Applies to openspec/changes/**/specs/**/spec.md : When using MODIFIED Requirements, paste the full requirement block including header and all scenarios

Applied to files:

  • openspec/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-make-apply-instructions-schema-aware/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: Fission-AI/OpenSpec PR: 0
File: openspec/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learning: Applies to openspec/changes/**/specs/**/spec.md : Use `## ADDED|MODIFIED|REMOVED|RENAMED Requirements` headers in spec delta files

Applied to files:

  • openspec/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-make-apply-instructions-schema-aware/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: Fission-AI/OpenSpec PR: 0
File: openspec/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learning: Applies to openspec/changes/*/proposal.md : Ensure `proposal.md` includes sections: Why (1-2 sentences), What Changes (bullet list with breaking change markers), and Impact (affected specs and code)

Applied to files:

  • openspec/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-make-apply-instructions-schema-aware/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: Fission-AI/OpenSpec PR: 0
File: openspec/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learning: Applies to openspec/changes/**/specs/**/spec.md : Use `#### Scenario: Name` format (4 hashtags) for scenario headers, not bullets or bold text

Applied to files:

  • openspec/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: Fission-AI/OpenSpec PR: 0
File: openspec/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learning: Applies to openspec/changes/**/*.md : Scaffold proposal using `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, optional `design.md`, and delta specs under `openspec/changes/<id>/`

Applied to files:

  • openspec/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-make-apply-instructions-schema-aware/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: Fission-AI/OpenSpec PR: 0
File: openspec/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learning: Run `openspec validate [change-id] --strict` before requesting approval

Applied to files:

  • openspec/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: Fission-AI/OpenSpec PR: 0
File: openspec/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learning: Use `openspec archive <change-id> --skip-specs --yes` for tooling-only changes

Applied to files:

  • openspec/specs/opsx-archive-skill/spec.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T01:08:02.839Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: Fission-AI/OpenSpec PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T01:08:02.839Z
Learning: Use `@/openspec/AGENTS.md` to learn how to create and apply change proposals, spec format and conventions, and project structure and guidelines

Applied to files:

  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-make-apply-instructions-schema-aware/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: Fission-AI/OpenSpec PR: 0
File: openspec/AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T01:08:19.004Z
Learning: Applies to openspec/changes/*/tasks.md : Ensure `tasks.md` contains implementation checklist with numbered sections and checkbox items

Applied to files:

  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-make-apply-instructions-schema-aware/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md
🪛 LanguageTool
openspec/specs/opsx-archive-skill/spec.md

[style] ~37-~37: ‘without warning’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...s have status done - THEN proceed without warning ### Requirement: Task Completion Check...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITHOUT_WARNING)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
openspec/specs/opsx-archive-skill/spec.md

3-3: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3

(MD001, heading-increment)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
openspec/changes/archive/2026-01-06-make-apply-instructions-schema-aware/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md (1)

1-60: Verify the full requirement block in MODIFIED Requirements.

Per coding guidelines, when using MODIFIED Requirements in spec delta files, the full requirement block including header and all scenarios should be included. Lines 49–60 show only the new scenario being added to Status Command; consider whether the full Status Command requirement (with all existing and new scenarios) should be present in this delta spec for completeness.

Note: Since this is an archived change that has already been synced, the actual applied changes should be validated in the main spec file instead.

openspec/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md (3)

30-35: New scenario properly extends Status Command.

The new "Status JSON includes apply requirements" scenario correctly integrates into the Status Command requirement, adding the applyRequires field to the JSON output. Formatting and normative language (SHALL) are correct per spec guidelines.


169-214: Schema Apply Block and Apply Instructions Command are well-structured.

Both new requirements follow spec conventions: proper ## ADDED Requirements header, correct #### Scenario: format with WHEN/THEN structure, and normative SHALL language. The three scenarios for Apply Instructions Command comprehensively cover successful generation, blocking behavior, and JSON output format. The Schema Apply Block correctly introduces apply.requires, apply.tracks, and apply.instruction concepts with both presence and absence scenarios.


215-221: REMOVED Requirements section is clear and actionable.

The deprecation of the Next Command is well-reasoned (redundancy with Status JSON filtering), and the migration path via openspec status --change <id> --json with filtering is clear and helpful.

openspec/specs/opsx-archive-skill/spec.md (1)

3-122: Comprehensive archive skill specification with clear scenarios.

The specification is well-structured with five cohesive requirements covering change selection, artifact/task completion checks, spec sync prompts, archive mechanics, and user feedback. All requirements use SHALL (normative language), and all scenarios follow the correct #### Scenario: format with proper WHEN/THEN structure. The scenarios comprehensively cover both happy paths and error conditions (e.g., incomplete artifacts, existing archive directories).

Comment on lines +1 to +3
# OPSX Archive Skill Spec

### Requirement: OPSX Archive Skill
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Add missing h2 section heading between title and requirements.

The file starts with an h1 heading (# OPSX Archive Skill Spec) then jumps directly to h3 (### Requirement:), skipping the h2 level. Add an intermediate h2 section (e.g., ## Purpose, ## Overview, or ## Specification) to comply with markdown structure conventions.

🔎 Suggested structure fix
 # OPSX Archive Skill Spec
 
+## Specification
+
 ### Requirement: OPSX Archive Skill
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
# OPSX Archive Skill Spec
### Requirement: OPSX Archive Skill
# OPSX Archive Skill Spec
## Specification
### Requirement: OPSX Archive Skill
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

3-3: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3

(MD001, heading-increment)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In @openspec/specs/opsx-archive-skill/spec.md around lines 1 - 3, Add an h2
heading between the existing H1 "OPSX Archive Skill Spec" and the H3 "###
Requirement" (for example "## Overview" or "## Purpose") so the document follows
proper markdown hierarchy; insert the chosen H2 immediately after the title and
before the "### Requirement: OPSX Archive Skill" section to restore the expected
heading structure.

@TabishB TabishB merged commit eb15cdb into main Jan 7, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants