Skip to content

Conversation

Jack251970
Copy link
Member

@Jack251970 Jack251970 commented Mar 4, 2025

Test done in Update GitHub Action #5.

TODO

  • Check NuGet publish.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 4, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This update introduces two new GitHub Actions workflows to automate the build, test, packaging, and release processes for a .NET project. The first workflow (build.yml) handles code checkout, .NET setup, dependency restoration, building, unit testing (conditionally), packaging, and artifact upload. The second workflow (publish.yml) performs similar steps but additionally retrieves the package version and publishes it via GitHub releases. Additionally, the version numbers in two project files have been updated from 1.0.0 to 0.0.1.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/build.yml, .github/workflows/publish.yml Added new GitHub Actions workflows to automate build, test, packaging, and release processes for the .NET project.
Flow.Launcher.Localization...Analyzers.csproj, Flow.Launcher.Localization...SourceGenerators.csproj Updated version numbers from 1.0.0 to 0.0.1 in the project files.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User as User/PR/Push
    participant GA as GitHub Actions
    participant Repo as Repository
    participant Dotnet as .NET Environment
    participant Test as Unit Tests

    User->>GA: Trigger build workflow (dispatch/push/PR)
    GA->>Repo: Checkout code
    GA->>Dotnet: Setup .NET version
    GA->>Dotnet: Restore dependencies
    GA->>Dotnet: Build project (Release)
    alt On push and non-main branch
      GA->>Test: Execute unit tests
    end
    GA->>Dotnet: Create NuGet package
    GA->>Repo: Upload NuGet package as artifact
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant User as User/Tag/Push
    participant GA as GitHub Actions
    participant Repo as Repository
    participant Dotnet as .NET Environment

    User->>GA: Trigger publish workflow (dispatch/push/main/tag)
    GA->>Repo: Checkout code
    GA->>Dotnet: Setup .NET SDK
    GA->>Dotnet: Restore dependencies
    GA->>Dotnet: Build project (Release)
    GA->>Dotnet: Create NuGet package
    GA->>Dotnet: Extract package version
    GA->>Repo: Publish package on GitHub releases
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • Include analyzers in the build #5: The changes in the main PR, which introduce a new GitHub Actions workflow for building a .NET project, are related to the retrieved PR that modifies the project configuration to include analyzers in the build process, as both involve enhancements to the build and packaging aspects of the .NET project.

Suggested reviewers

  • Yusyuriv

Poem

Hopping through the code like a lively breeze,
New workflows sprout with effortless ease.
I nibble on bugs and build with cheer,
A package delight for every peer.
With whiskers twitching, I celebrate this day,
A rabbit’s rhyme in a joyful display!
🐰✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6060850 and 71b34d6.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Flow.Launcher.Localization.Analyzers/Flow.Launcher.Localization.Analyzers.csproj (1 hunks)
  • Flow.Launcher.Localization.SourceGenerators/Flow.Launcher.Localization.SourceGenerators.csproj (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • Flow.Launcher.Localization.SourceGenerators/Flow.Launcher.Localization.SourceGenerators.csproj
  • Flow.Launcher.Localization.Analyzers/Flow.Launcher.Localization.Analyzers.csproj
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: gitStream.cm

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/dotnet.yml (3)

15-18: Environment Variables Configured
The environment variables (Dotnet_Version, Project_Path, NuGet_Source) are set properly. However, note that "Project_Path" is defined with mixed casing; ensure that all references (e.g., in subsequent steps) use the correct variable name to avoid potential mismatches.


48-55: Artifact Upload Configuration
The upload step correctly uses actions/upload-artifact@v4 to archive the generated NuGet package.
Optional Suggestion: For improved cross-platform compatibility, consider using forward slashes (/) in file paths (e.g., nupkgs/Flow.Launcher.Localization.*.nupkg), even though the job runs on Windows.


56-60: Handling Commented-out Publish Step
The commented-out section for publishing to NuGet.org is clear and appropriately gated to run only on pushes to the main branch. If this functionality is planned for future activation, consider adding a TODO note. Otherwise, removing unused code can help keep the repository clean.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c342c78 and 6493096.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/dotnet.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
.github/workflows/dotnet.yml (8)

1-2: Workflow Name is Clear
The workflow name ".NET Core Desktop" is descriptive and aligns with its purpose.


3-8: Workflow Triggers are Comprehensive
The trigger configuration includes manual dispatch, pushes to the "main" branch, and pull requests, which covers a broad range of CI/CD scenarios.


9-14: Job Definition and Runtime Environment
The job "build" is correctly defined with runs-on: windows-latest, ensuring that the workflow runs in a Windows environment suitable for .NET Core Desktop applications.


20-25: Checkout Step Validation
The "Checkout" step uses actions/checkout@v4 correctly to retrieve the repository contents.


26-31: Setup .NET Environment
The workflow leverages actions/setup-dotnet@v4 with the provided dotnet-version, ensuring that the correct .NET version is installed.


32-35: Restore Dependencies
The restore step executes dotnet restore using the project path from the environment variable. The command is correctly set up to initialize dependencies.


36-39: Build Project Command
The build step invokes dotnet build in Release configuration without restoring dependencies again, which is efficient given the prior restore step.


40-43: Unit Testing Execution
The test step calls dotnet test in Release mode without rebuilding, assuming that the build artifacts are already present. This is efficient if the prior build is comprehensive.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
.github/workflows/dotnet.yml (1)

44-47: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Fix Environment Variable Reference in NuGet Packaging.
The NuGet packaging command references the project file using ${{ env.PROJECT_PATH }}, but the environment variable is declared as Project_Path (line 17). This inconsistency in casing could lead to runtime errors. Please update the reference for consistency. For example:

-      run: dotnet pack ${{ env.PROJECT_PATH }} --configuration Release --no-build --output nupkgs
+      run: dotnet pack ${{ env.Project_Path }} --configuration Release --no-build --output nupkgs
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/dotnet.yml (1)

16-17: Consider Quoting File Paths.
The Project_Path value contains backslashes (Windows path). Quoting this string (e.g., "Flow.Launcher.Localization\Flow.Launcher.Localization.csproj") can help avoid potential YAML parsing pitfalls.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6493096 and f54111b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/dotnet.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
.github/workflows/dotnet.yml (9)

3-8: Workflow Trigger Events are Correct.
The workflow is properly configured to trigger on manual dispatch, pushes to the "main" branch, and pull requests.


15-18: Environment Variables Setup is Correct.
The environment variables are defined clearly. However, note that the variable for the project path is declared as Project_Path. Ensure all references use the same casing.


22-24: Checkout Step is Configured Correctly.
Using actions/checkout@v4 ensures that the latest repository code is fetched.


26-30: .NET SDK Setup is Valid.
The configuration for setting up .NET using the specified Dotnet_Version is accurate and follows best practices.


32-34: Restore Dependencies Step is Configured Correctly.
The command to restore dependencies using the provided project path is properly set up.


36-38: Build Step is Configured Correctly.
The project is built in Release mode without re-restoring dependencies, which aligns with efficient build practices.


40-42: Unit Tests Execution is Configured Correctly.
Running tests in Release mode without rebuilding is an effective approach assuming the build step produced the necessary binaries.


48-55: Artifact Upload Step is Configured Correctly.
The upload step uses actions/upload-artifact@v4 with clear parameters for artifact name and path.


56-59: Conditional NuGet Publication is Configured Correctly.
The publishing step is correctly conditioned to run only on push events to the main branch, ensuring that NuGet packages are not published on every pull request or manual trigger.

@Jack251970 Jack251970 self-assigned this Mar 4, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/dotnet.yml (1)

3-8: Workflow Triggers Configuration
The workflow is triggered on manual dispatch, pushes to the “main” branch, and pull requests. Consider verifying if the blank configuration for the pull_request event is intentional. A more detailed filter may be beneficial for consistency in triggering events.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a3dd61 and 40bc9c8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/dotnet.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/dotnet.yml

70-70: the runner of "softprops/action-gh-release@v1" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🔇 Additional comments (10)
.github/workflows/dotnet.yml (10)

1-2: Workflow Name is Clear
The workflow name “.NET Core Desktop” is descriptive and clear.


11-18: Job Configuration and Environment Variables
The “build” job is set to run on the latest Windows environment. The environment variables (Dotnet_Version and Project_Path) are defined consistently and referenced correctly in later steps.


21-24: Checkout Step Configuration
The step correctly uses actions/checkout@v4 to check out the repository, ensuring that the code is available for subsequent steps.


25-30: Setup .NET Step
The “Setup .NET” step is properly configured with actions/setup-dotnet@v4, using the environment variable for the .NET version.


31-34: Restore Dependencies Step
The workflow correctly restores dependencies with the dotnet restore command, referencing the project path from environment variables.


35-38: Build Project Step
The build step uses the dotnet build command with the Release configuration and avoids redundant restores. This is both efficient and clear.


39-42: Execute Unit Tests Step
Running unit tests with dotnet test in Release configuration (without building again) is efficient. Ensure that all necessary tests are covered.


43-46: NuGet Package Creation Step
The NuGet package is created using dotnet pack with appropriate parameters (Release configuration, no-build, and specified output directory).


47-54: Artifact Upload Step
The step “Upload NuGet package” leverages actions/upload-artifact@v4 correctly, specifying the artifact name, path, and compression level.


55-59: Publish to NuGet.org Step
The NuGet push command is conditionally triggered on pushes to the main branch, which is appropriate. The use of backslashes in the file path appears consistent with the Windows environment.

Jack251970 and others added 3 commits March 4, 2025 18:31
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/publish.yml (1)

57-64: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Publish GitHub Releases Step & Action Version Update
The step to publish GitHub releases uses softprops/action-gh-release@v1. However, static analysis suggests that this version is outdated. It is recommended to update this action to a more recent version (e.g., v1.3.1 or later) to avoid potential issues with runner compatibility. See the diff suggestion below:

- uses: softprops/action-gh-release@v1
+ uses: softprops/[email protected]

Additionally, verify that the tag naming using "v${{ env.release_version }}" meets your versioning requirements.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

60-60: the runner of "softprops/action-gh-release@v1" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/publish.yml (4)

1-2: Newline Character Consistency
Static analysis indicates an issue with the newline character on line 1 (expected \n). Please ensure that the file uses UNIX-style newlines to maintain consistency across the repository.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 1-1: wrong new line character: expected \n

(new-lines)


1-2: Workflow Name Consistency
Even though this is the publish workflow, the workflow name is declared as build. Consider renaming it (for example, to publish) for clarity and to avoid confusion with the build workflow.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 1-1: wrong new line character: expected \n

(new-lines)


45-48: Commented-out NuGet Push Step
There’s a commented-out section for pushing to NuGet.org. If this step is not required or is planned for future use, consider removing the commented code to keep the workflow clean.


24-25: Indentation Issue
Static analysis warns that the indentation for the checkout step appears to be off (expected 6 spaces but found 4). Adjust the indentation to maintain YAML consistency. For example:

-    - name: Checkout
+      - name: Checkout

Ensure that all list items under steps are consistently indented relative to the parent key.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[warning] 24-24: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 40bc9c8 and 6060850.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/publish.yml (1 hunks)
  • Flow.Launcher.Localization.Analyzers/Flow.Launcher.Localization.Analyzers.csproj (1 hunks)
  • Flow.Launcher.Localization.SourceGenerators/Flow.Launcher.Localization.SourceGenerators.csproj (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • Flow.Launcher.Localization.SourceGenerators/Flow.Launcher.Localization.SourceGenerators.csproj
  • Flow.Launcher.Localization.Analyzers/Flow.Launcher.Localization.Analyzers.csproj
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/publish.yml

60-60: the runner of "softprops/action-gh-release@v1" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/publish.yml

[error] 1-1: wrong new line character: expected \n

(new-lines)


[warning] 24-24: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)

🔇 Additional comments (9)
.github/workflows/build.yml (5)

1-2: Workflow Name Declaration
The workflow is clearly named and correctly declared.


3-8: Trigger Events Configuration
The workflow is configured to trigger on manual dispatch, pushes to the main branch, and pull requests. This configuration is valid; however, verify if you intend for pull request events to trigger the workflow without branch filtering.


15-17: Environment Variables Setup
The environment variables (Dotnet_Version and Project_Path) are clearly defined. Note that the Project_Path uses Windows-style backslashes, which is appropriate for a Windows runner.


39-43: Unit Tests Execution Condition
The step for executing unit tests uses the condition:

if: github.event_name == 'push' && github.ref != 'refs/heads/main'

This means tests will only run on push events when the branch isn’t main, and they won’t run for pull request events. Please verify that this is intentional. If you want tests to run on PRs as well, consider revising the condition.


44-54: NuGet Package Creation and Upload
The steps to pack and upload the NuGet package look correct. The use of actions/upload-artifact@v4 and the specification of the output path are appropriate.

.github/workflows/publish.yml (4)

3-10: Trigger Configuration
The workflow is configured to trigger via manual dispatch, pushes to the main branch, and tags. This setup is consistent with a publish workflow.


23-26: Checkout Step
The checkout step correctly uses actions/checkout@v4.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[warning] 24-24: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)


27-32: .NET Setup Step
The .NET setup step is correctly configured with actions/setup-dotnet@v4 and it uses the environment variable for the dotnet version.


50-55: Get Package Version Step
The PowerShell snippet correctly retrieves the package version from the DLL file and sets it as an environment variable. Ensure that the file path (bin\Release\netstandard2.0\Flow.Launcher.Localization.dll) is valid for your project’s output.

@jjw24
Copy link
Member

jjw24 commented Mar 5, 2025

@Jack251970 I changed so publish will happen on tag creation. This allows you guys to keep merging to main without the worry of triggering NuGet publish

@Jack251970
Copy link
Member Author

@Jack251970 I changed so publish will happen on tag creation. This allows you guys to keep merging to main without the worry of triggering NuGet publish

Okay, thanks.

@Jack251970 Jack251970 merged commit b020c98 into main Mar 5, 2025
2 checks passed
@jjw24 jjw24 deleted the github_action branch March 5, 2025 10:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants