Skip to content

Conversation

@Jack251970
Copy link
Member

Improve plugin loading performance using concurrency

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 15, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve a transition from synchronous to asynchronous processing in the plugin management system of the application. Key methods in several files have been updated to return Task objects instead of collections of PluginPair, allowing for non-blocking execution during plugin setup and loading. This includes modifications to the AbstractPluginEnvironment, PluginManager, and PluginsLoader classes, enhancing the efficiency of plugin initialization and error handling during the loading process.

Changes

Files Change Summary
Flow.Launcher.Core/ExternalPlugins/Environments/AbstractPluginEnvironment.cs Changed return types of Setup and SetPathForPluginPairs methods from IEnumerable<PluginPair> to IEnumerable<Task>.
Flow.Launcher.Core/Plugin/PluginManager.cs Renamed LoadPlugins to LoadPluginsAsync, shifting to an asynchronous operation.
Flow.Launcher.Core/Plugin/PluginsLoader.cs Updated Plugins method to PluginsAsync returning Task<List<PluginPair>>. Changed other methods to return IEnumerable<Task>.
Flow.Launcher/App.xaml.cs Replaced PluginManager.LoadPlugins with PluginManager.LoadPluginsAsync for non-blocking startup.

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix startup localization issues #2881: The changes in PluginManager.cs related to the GetPluginsForInterface<T>() method do not directly connect to the asynchronous changes in the main PR, but they involve modifications within the same file, indicating potential interactions in the plugin management logic.

Suggested labels

Dev branch only

Poem

🐰 In the land of code where plugins play,
Asynchronous hops brighten the day.
Tasks now run without a care,
Loading plugins with time to spare.
A swift little rabbit, quick and spry,
Cheers for changes that help us fly! 🌟


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0871a0b and 14fd0e5.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • Flow.Launcher.Core/ExternalPlugins/Environments/AbstractPluginEnvironment.cs (4 hunks)
  • Flow.Launcher.Core/Plugin/PluginsLoader.cs (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (10)
Flow.Launcher.Core/Plugin/PluginsLoader.cs (6)

20-21: LGTM!

The use of ConcurrentQueue for storing PluginPair objects is a good choice to ensure thread-safe operations when multiple tasks are executed concurrently. This aligns well with the goal of introducing asynchronous processing in the plugin loading functionality.


22-23: LGTM!

Using ConcurrentQueue for ErroredPlugins is a good choice to ensure thread-safe operations when multiple tasks are executed concurrently. Storing the names of errored plugins separately is a nice approach for error handling and reporting.


24-28: LGTM!

The AddPlugin method provides a convenient way to add plugins to the Plugins queue. Enqueuing the plugin pair into the concurrent queue ensures thread-safe addition of plugins.


Line range hint 29-79: Excellent work on making the plugin loading process asynchronous!

The changes introduce several improvements:

  • Asynchronous processing allows for non-blocking execution during plugin loading.
  • Setting up various plugin environments and loading them concurrently enhances the efficiency of the plugin initialization process.
  • Error handling is significantly improved by storing the names of errored plugins and displaying a message box to inform the user about any errors encountered.
  • Returning the loaded plugins as a list allows for further processing or usage of the successfully loaded plugins.

Overall, these modifications greatly enhance the performance and user experience of the plugin loading functionality.


Line range hint 82-138: Great job on optimizing the DotNetPlugins method!

The changes introduce several improvements:

  • Returning an IEnumerable<Task> allows for parallel execution of plugin initialization, enhancing performance.
  • Encapsulating each plugin loading operation within a Task.Run ensures that the loading process is non-blocking and can be executed concurrently.
  • Enqueuing the name of errored plugins into ErroredPlugins enables centralized error handling and reporting.
  • Enqueuing the successfully loaded plugin pair into the Plugins queue ensures thread-safe addition of plugins.

These modifications significantly improve the efficiency and robustness of the DotNetPlugins loading process.


140-152: Excellent work on optimizing the ExecutablePlugins and ExecutableV2Plugins methods!

The changes introduce similar improvements as in the DotNetPlugins method:

  • Returning an IEnumerable<Task> allows for parallel execution of plugin initialization, enhancing performance.
  • Encapsulating each plugin loading operation within a Task.Run ensures that the loading process is non-blocking and can be executed concurrently.
  • Enqueuing the successfully loaded plugin pair into the Plugins queue ensures thread-safe addition of plugins.

These modifications significantly improve the efficiency of the executable plugin loading process.

Also applies to: 154-166

Flow.Launcher.Core/ExternalPlugins/Environments/AbstractPluginEnvironment.cs (4)

11-12: LGTM!

The addition of the System.Threading.Tasks and Flow.Launcher.Core.Plugin namespaces is necessary for the asynchronous plugin loading changes in this file.


42-45: LGTM!

The changes to the return type of the Setup method and the early return statement are consistent with the transition to asynchronous plugin setup.


92-92: LGTM!

Returning an empty list of Task in the error case is consistent with the new asynchronous plugin setup approach.


111-121: LGTM!

The changes to the SetPathForPluginPairs method enable asynchronous creation of plugin pairs, allowing for concurrent execution and improved performance. The use of Task.Run and the return type change to IEnumerable<Task> are consistent with this approach.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

@taooceros taooceros left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks cool! Could you give a small benchmark about the speed up?

PluginSettings = pluginSettings;
}

internal IEnumerable<PluginPair> Setup()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why would you not use a generic version of task?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have fixed this.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions
Copy link

@check-spelling-bot Report

🔴 Please review

See the 📂 files view, the 📜action log, or 📝 job summary for details.

❌ Errors Count
❌ ignored-expect-variant 1
⚠️ non-alpha-in-dictionary 13

See ❌ Event descriptions for more information.

If the flagged items are 🤯 false positives

If items relate to a ...

  • binary file (or some other file you wouldn't want to check at all).

    Please add a file path to the excludes.txt file matching the containing file.

    File paths are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your files.

    ^ refers to the file's path from the root of the repository, so ^README\.md$ would exclude README.md (on whichever branch you're using).

  • well-formed pattern.

    If you can write a pattern that would match it,
    try adding it to the patterns.txt file.

    Patterns are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your lines.

    Note that patterns can't match multiline strings.

@Jack251970
Copy link
Member Author

Looks cool! Could you give a small benchmark about the speed up?

It seems this optimization is invalid. The instance-creating functions are executed very fast, and thus concurrency are hard to optimize their performances.

@Jack251970 Jack251970 closed this Sep 17, 2024
@Jack251970 Jack251970 deleted the dev branch January 19, 2025 07:10
@Jack251970 Jack251970 restored the dev branch January 19, 2025 07:11
@Jack251970 Jack251970 deleted the dev branch January 19, 2025 07:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants