Skip to content

Conversation

Jack251970
Copy link
Member

Resolve #3519.

Tested:

  • When home page feature is on and input is empty, if there are items in result list box, arrow up will trigger result index change instead of history results change.

@prlabeler prlabeler bot added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request labels May 11, 2025
@Jack251970 Jack251970 requested a review from jjw24 May 11, 2025 06:34
@Jack251970 Jack251970 added Dev branch only An issue or fix for the Dev branch build and removed enhancement New feature or request labels May 11, 2025
@Jack251970 Jack251970 added this to the 1.20.0 milestone May 11, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented May 11, 2025

🥷 Code experts: onesounds

Jack251970, onesounds have most 👩‍💻 activity in the files.
Jack251970 has most 🧠 knowledge in the files.

See details

Flow.Launcher/ViewModel/MainViewModel.cs

Activity based on git-commit:

Jack251970 onesounds
MAY 482 additions & 291 deletions
APR 35 additions & 28 deletions
MAR 695 additions & 628 deletions 293 additions & 201 deletions
FEB 63 additions & 21 deletions 23 additions & 25 deletions
JAN 17 additions & 21 deletions
DEC 59 additions & 63 deletions

Knowledge based on git-blame:
Jack251970: 39%

To learn more about /:\ gitStream - Visit our Docs

Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented May 11, 2025

Be a legend 🏆 by adding a before and after screenshot of the changes you made, especially if they are around UI/UX.

Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented May 11, 2025

Be a legend 🏆 by adding a before and after screenshot of the changes you made, especially if they are around UI/UX.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 11, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

"""

Walkthrough

The SelectPrevItem method in MainViewModel.cs was modified to include an explicit check for the visibility of results before navigating the query history. The control flow now prioritizes checking if results are selected, the query is empty, results are not visible, and history exists before reversing history; otherwise, it selects the previous result.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
Flow.Launcher/ViewModel/MainViewModel.cs Refined the conditional logic in SelectPrevItem to add a results visibility check before reversing history.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant MainViewModel

    User->>MainViewModel: Press Arrow Up
    alt Results selected AND Query is empty AND Results not visible AND History exists
        MainViewModel->>MainViewModel: Reset lastHistoryIndex
        MainViewModel->>MainViewModel: ReverseHistory()
    else
        MainViewModel->>MainViewModel: SelectPrevResult()
    end
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Arrow up triggers results history on homepage when history exists (#3519)

Suggested labels

Dev branch only

Suggested reviewers

  • jjw24

Poem

A hop and a skip on the homepage anew,
Press arrow up—history’s now in view!
With checks for what’s shown,
The right path is known,
Flow’s memory dances, as all rabbits do! 🐇✨
"""

Tip

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching
  • CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.

Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 25d985b and af5ff43.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Flow.Launcher/ViewModel/MainViewModel.cs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • Flow.Launcher/ViewModel/MainViewModel.cs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
  • GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
  • GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
  • GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
  • GitHub Check: build
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jjw24 jjw24 removed the bug Something isn't working label May 11, 2025
@jjw24 jjw24 enabled auto-merge May 11, 2025 08:17
Copy link

@check-spelling-bot Report

🔴 Please review

See the 📂 files view, the 📜action log, or 📝 job summary for details.

❌ Errors and Warnings Count
❌ forbidden-pattern 22
⚠️ non-alpha-in-dictionary 19

See ❌ Event descriptions for more information.

If the flagged items are 🤯 false positives

If items relate to a ...

  • binary file (or some other file you wouldn't want to check at all).

    Please add a file path to the excludes.txt file matching the containing file.

    File paths are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your files.

    ^ refers to the file's path from the root of the repository, so ^README\.md$ would exclude README.md (on whichever branch you're using).

  • well-formed pattern.

    If you can write a pattern that would match it,
    try adding it to the patterns.txt file.

    Patterns are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your lines.

    Note that patterns can't match multiline strings.

@jjw24 jjw24 merged commit 1b2b49a into dev May 11, 2025
14 checks passed
@jjw24 jjw24 deleted the home_page_history branch May 11, 2025 08:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Dev branch only An issue or fix for the Dev branch build

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Dev branch - Homepage with triggers history results on arrow up

2 participants