Skip to content

Conversation

@jjw24
Copy link
Member

@jjw24 jjw24 commented Nov 20, 2025

Merge v2.0.3 back to dev from master

@jjw24 jjw24 requested a review from Jack251970 November 20, 2025 12:14
@jjw24 jjw24 self-assigned this Nov 20, 2025
@jjw24 jjw24 added the release Release PR which contains the changes going into the upcoming release label Nov 20, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 2.1.0 milestone Nov 20, 2025
@jjw24 jjw24 removed this from the 2.1.0 milestone Nov 20, 2025
@gitstream-cm
Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented Nov 20, 2025

🥷 Code experts: no user but you matched threshold 10

jjw24 has most 👩‍💻 activity in the files.
jjw24 has most 🧠 knowledge in the files.

See details

appveyor.yml

Activity based on git-commit:

jjw24
NOV
OCT 1 additions & 1 deletions
SEP 1 additions & 1 deletions
AUG 1 additions & 1 deletions
JUL 1 additions & 1 deletions
JUN 5 additions & 3 deletions

Knowledge based on git-blame:
jjw24: 36%

✨ Comment /gs review for LinearB AI review. Learn how to automate it here.

@gitstream-cm
Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented Nov 20, 2025

Be a legend 🏆 by adding a before and after screenshot of the changes you made, especially if they are around UI/UX.

@jjw24 jjw24 enabled auto-merge November 20, 2025 12:16
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 20, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The AppVeyor configuration file is updated to bump the build version from 2.0.2.{build} to 2.0.3.{build}, and removes two lines from the before_build initialization section that manually configure and start the Windows Search service.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Build Configuration
appveyor.yml
Version bumped from 2.0.2.{build} to 2.0.3.{build}; removed Windows Search service initialization commands (sc config WSearch start= auto and net start WSearch) from before_build section

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Straightforward version update and removal of two service initialization lines with no logic changes

Possibly related PRs

  • Merge v2.0.2 back to dev #4047 — Modifies the same appveyor.yml file, removes identical Windows Search service start commands, and similarly bumps the AppVeyor version

Suggested reviewers

  • Jack251970

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the PR objective of merging v2.0.3 back to the dev branch from master.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changeset, clearly indicating a merge of v2.0.3 from master back to dev.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch merge_2_0_3

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 533a58d and 1c29fb2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • appveyor.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (2)
appveyor.yml (2)

1-1: Version bump aligns with PR objectives.

The version is correctly updated to 2.0.3.{build}, consistent with merging v2.0.3 back to dev.


1-98: Inconsistency between AI summary and provided code.

The AI summary states that lines configuring Windows Search (sc config WSearch and net start WSearch) were removed from the init section. However, these lines are still present in the provided code at lines 14–15 without modification markers (~), indicating they remain unchanged in this merge.

Please clarify whether these lines were actually removed in v2.0.3 on master, or if the summary is inaccurate.

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@jjw24 jjw24 merged commit bb841fc into dev Nov 20, 2025
13 checks passed
@jjw24 jjw24 deleted the merge_2_0_3 branch November 20, 2025 12:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

release Release PR which contains the changes going into the upcoming release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants