Skip to content

Conversation

@mintsuki
Copy link
Collaborator

This mirrors PR #70, done for similar reasons.

@FlyGoat
Copy link
Owner

FlyGoat commented Jun 16, 2025

@mintsuki
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Well, then we shouldn't be falling back to SMBIOS3 at all, no?

@FlyGoat
Copy link
Owner

FlyGoat commented Jun 16, 2025

It won't hurt in case we want to fix SeaBIOS at some point:-)

Also for SMBIOS we are unlikely to have ACPI 1.0 style compatibility issue.

@mintsuki mintsuki changed the title Prefer SMBIOS3 table to SMBIOS, if present and below 4G Prefer SMBIOS table to SMBIOS 3.0, if present and below 4G Jun 16, 2025
@mintsuki
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Should be good now, I believe.

@FlyGoat
Copy link
Owner

FlyGoat commented Jun 16, 2025

Maybe commit message needs to be updated to reflect the change?

@mintsuki
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Maybe commit message needs to be updated to reflect the change?

I did update it, though :)

@FlyGoat
Copy link
Owner

FlyGoat commented Jun 16, 2025

Maybe commit message needs to be updated to reflect the change?

I did update it, though :)

Hmm, what I see is
img

@mintsuki
Copy link
Collaborator Author

What's the issue with that? What would you like the commit message to be?

Initially it was Prefer SMBIOS3 table to SMBIOS, if present and below 4G, and I changed it to that after we discussed what to change.

@FlyGoat
Copy link
Owner

FlyGoat commented Jun 16, 2025

@mintsuki Maybe it should be Prefer SMBIOS2.1 table to SMBIOS, if present and below 4G, as we are scanning for smbiosGuid first?

This is because SeaBIOS relies on SMBIOS 2.1, not SMBIOS 3.0.
@mintsuki
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@FlyGoat I hope this is better.

@FlyGoat
Copy link
Owner

FlyGoat commented Jun 16, 2025

lgtm thanks

@FlyGoat FlyGoat merged commit c3162c7 into FlyGoat:main Jun 16, 2025
1 check passed
@mintsuki mintsuki deleted the prefer-smbios3 branch June 16, 2025 23:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants