Skip to content

credits changed#144

Merged
AWqxKAWERbXo merged 1 commit intomainfrom
skerbis-patch-credis
Jul 3, 2025
Merged

credits changed#144
AWqxKAWERbXo merged 1 commit intomainfrom
skerbis-patch-credis

Conversation

@skerbis
Copy link
Member

@skerbis skerbis commented Jul 3, 2025

Credits geändert und ergänzt.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the README to adjust contributor listings and annotations in the "Projekt-Team" and "Credits" sections. No changes to app functionality.

Credits geändert und ergänzt.
@skerbis skerbis requested review from AWqxKAWERbXo and Copilot July 3, 2025 14:16
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR restructures the credits section by moving an entry from the project team to “Credits,” removing duplicates, and adding role annotations.

  • Moved KLXM Crossmedia / Thomas Skerbis from the team list into Credits as former lead
  • Added Christian Gehrke under Credits as the author of the first version
  • Removed the duplicated Christian Gehrke entry under Projekt-Team
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

README.md:97

  • [nitpick] Consider using English 'Thanks to:' instead of German 'Danke an:' to maintain language consistency in the README.
Danke an:

README.md:99

  • [nitpick] Use parentheses or a dash instead of '//' for inline notes in markdown (e.g., '(former lead)') for clearer rendering.
* [KLXM Crossmedia / Thomas Skerbis](https://klxm.de) // former lead

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 3, 2025

Walkthrough

The README file was updated to modify the listing and annotations of contributors. "KLXM Crossmedia / Thomas Skerbis" was moved from the "Projekt-Team" section to the "Credits" section with a new annotation, and "Christian Gehrke" was repositioned and annotated. No code or logic was changed.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Reordered and annotated contributors in "Projekt-Team" and "Credits" sections; updated attributions.

Poem

🐇
In the README garden, names rearrange,
Credits and honors gently change.
With a hop and a note, the team’s anew,
Old leads remembered, first versions in view.
Rabbits delight in lists so neat—
Every contributor gets a treat!


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

99-100: Minor Markdown style nit – prefer parentheses or an em-dash over // for in-line notes

Using the // marker inside bullet text is uncommon in Markdown and may be rendered literally in some viewers.
Consider replacing with parentheses or an em-dash to keep the list visually consistent and avoid possible lint warnings.

-* [KLXM Crossmedia / Thomas Skerbis](https://klxm.de) // former lead
-* [Christian Gehrke](https://github.com/chrison94) // first version
+* [KLXM Crossmedia / Thomas Skerbis](https://klxm.de) — former lead
+* [Christian Gehrke](https://github.com/chrison94) — first version
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4650d83 and 93dbbb7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[typographical] ~99-~99: Zeichen ohne sein Gegenstück: ‚[‘ scheint zu fehlen
Context: ...an: * KLXM Crossmedia / Thomas Skerbis // former lead * [Chri...

(UNPAIRED_BRACKETS)


[uncategorized] ~99-~99: Das sieht falsch platziert oder unnötig aus. Überlegen Sie, es zu löschen.
Context: ...Skerbis](https://klxm.de) // former lead * [Christian Gehrke](https://github.com/chr...

(AI_DE_GGEC_UNNECESSARY_SPACE)


[typographical] ~100-~100: Zeichen ohne sein Gegenstück: ‚[‘ scheint zu fehlen
Context: ...m.de) // former lead * Christian Gehrke // first ...

(UNPAIRED_BRACKETS)


[uncategorized] ~100-~100: Das sieht falsch platziert oder unnötig aus. Überlegen Sie, es zu löschen.
Context: ...//github.com/chrison94) // first version * Thorben * [Oli...

(AI_DE_GGEC_UNNECESSARY_SPACE)

@AWqxKAWERbXo AWqxKAWERbXo merged commit 9a32ace into main Jul 3, 2025
2 checks passed
@AWqxKAWERbXo AWqxKAWERbXo deleted the skerbis-patch-credis branch July 3, 2025 17:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants