Skip to content

Conversation

@Bubusch
Copy link
Contributor

@Bubusch Bubusch commented Dec 16, 2025

  • no more official support for Pangea-3
  • use Maple instead
  • also remove old Pangea-4 host configs

comes with TPL-331

@Bubusch Bubusch self-assigned this Dec 16, 2025
@Bubusch Bubusch changed the title remove pangea-3 build ci: remove pangea-3 build Dec 16, 2025
@Bubusch Bubusch added ci: run CUDA builds Allows to triggers (costly) CUDA jobs ci: run integrated tests Allows to run the integrated tests in GEOS CI ci: run code coverage enables running of the code coverage CI jobs labels Dec 17, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 17, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 58.81%. Comparing base (58178e4) to head (5107311).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3923      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    58.93%   58.81%   -0.13%     
===========================================
  Files         1351     1350       -1     
  Lines       112834   112717     -117     
===========================================
- Hits         66499    66293     -206     
- Misses       46335    46424      +89     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Bubusch Bubusch requested a review from MelReyCG January 8, 2026 14:55
@jhuang2601 jhuang2601 added the flag: no rebaseline Does not require rebaseline label Jan 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci: run code coverage enables running of the code coverage CI jobs ci: run CUDA builds Allows to triggers (costly) CUDA jobs ci: run integrated tests Allows to run the integrated tests in GEOS CI flag: no rebaseline Does not require rebaseline

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants