v11: Fix for SRF_TYPE #1124
Merged
v11: Fix for SRF_TYPE #1124
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Conditional is now consistent with v12 branch
GEOSagcm_GridComp/GEOSphysics_GridComp/GEOSmoist_GridComp/Process_Library.F90
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sdrabenh
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2025
sdrabenh
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #1122
This is a simple fix for the
SRF_TYPEbug detailed in #1122. Tests at c24 for a day show it is non-zero-diff as expected though the differences after one day are quite small it seems.