-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 458
docs: describe GeoJSON fields in directions response #2154
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
aoles
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot for the prompt fix! ❤️
Do you think we could include the description in the interactive docs (aka API Playground) as well? Cheers! 🙏
|
aoles
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot for documenting the missing bits! 🙏
We should probably verify the changes on staging before the merge.



Pull Request Checklist
have been resolved.
[Unreleased] heading.
along with a short description of what it is for, and documented this in the Pull Request (below).
(at least Germany), and the graphs build without problems (i.e. no out-of-memory errors).
importer etc.), I have generated longer distance routes for the affected profiles with different options
(avoid features, max weight etc.) and compared these with the routes of the same parameters and start/end
points generated from the current live ORS.
If there are differences then the reasoning for these MUST be documented in the pull request.
and why the change was needed.
Fixes #2084.
Information about the changes
JsonandGeojsonresponses of the directions endpoint.Examples and reasons for differences between live ORS routes, and those generated from this pull request
Required changes to ors config (if applicable)