Skip to content

Conversation

@mcmontseny
Copy link
Contributor

@mcmontseny mcmontseny commented Oct 24, 2020

Add SonarCloud analysis using Github Actions

Copy link
Contributor

@XaviTorello XaviTorello left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well done @mcmontseny 👍

Do you know why the action is reporting no issues, but there are major issues on SC?

image

Maybe it's something that we could review

Thanks dude! 🍻

@XaviTorello
Copy link
Contributor

I think that SC just analyzes the changes introduced by the PR, can it be @mcmontseny?

@mcmontseny
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think that SC just analyzes the changes introduced by the PR, can it be @mcmontseny?

Hi @XaviTorello Yes, only analyze PR code

Copy link
Contributor

@XaviTorello XaviTorello left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As done in the backend, maybe it's a good idea to define an specific action or job for Sonar CI

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities (and Security Hotspot 0 Security Hotspots to review)
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@mcmontseny
Copy link
Contributor Author

As done in the backend, maybe it's a good idea to define an specific action or job for Sonar CI

The new workflow is ready! Thanks for your review 👍

@mcmontseny mcmontseny requested a review from d-asensio October 27, 2020 20:40
@d-asensio d-asensio removed their request for review August 19, 2022 09:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants