-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 229
Changelog entry for v0.16.0 #3971
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+74
−14
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0c99245
Add v0.15.0 entry in doc/_static/version_switch.js for documentation …
seisman 57f6bc7
Add the version to the compatibility table doc/minversions.md
seisman 4340e86
Update citation information CITATION.cff and BibTeX in README
seisman f8ec823
Update affiliation of YF
seisman 382e6e9
Copy the draft release note from the release page
seisman 3af4c94
Update release date, doi and contributors in the changelog
seisman 9af616c
Move Michael before William
seisman 0f780bc
Merge some change entries
seisman dbf83a7
Add hightlights
seisman 851e43b
Merge some entries
seisman 493153c
Reorder some entries
seisman 13d4fbf
Boldify one changelog entry
seisman 1237257
Merge branch 'main' into changelog/v0.16.0
seisman 62f0e19
Add two new changelog entries for recently merged PRs
seisman 4268e90
Reorder some entries
seisman 61dd832
Merge branch 'main' into changelog/v0.16.0
seisman 850b4d9
Add changelog entry for PR 3980 [skip ci]
seisman 8061209
Add FE as contributor
seisman File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm ok with moving up the list, but I'm thinking if we should move Leo to second last (before Paul)? At least in my field, supervisory roles are placed in the last author(s) position, but unsure about what others think here.
Oh, and if moving Leo, we might as well update his affiliation to Universidade de São Paulo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about keeping the author order in this release and having more discussions later, since the release due date is very close?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, we can discuss this for the next release (v0.17.0).