style(python): update ruff to 0.8.6

[github-actions]

Update Ruff to 0.8.6 (originally 0.8.4 but they added a few new releases, why not use them). Add some new linting groups:

• TRY
• PLC
• PLE
• SLOT

Update rule ignores

• ANN101 and ANN102 are no longer supported, so they are no longer ignored
• Ignore PLC0206
• Ignore D103 in tests

See some draft PRs for examples of what changes:

• https://github.com/cancervariants/gene-normalization/pull/392/files
• https://github.com/GenomicMedLab/dgipy/pull/91/files
• https://github.com/cancervariants/metakb/pull/416/files

[jsstevenson]

potential new rules to ignore:

• PLC0206 requires explicit use of for key in dict.keys() when iterating through dict keys, rather than for key in dict. It says it's clearer, which is true, but it's also more verbose

[jsstevenson]

PLC0206 requires explicit use of for key in dict.keys() when iterating through dict keys, rather than for key in dict. It says it's clearer, which is true, but it's also more verbose

Discussion on slack concluded that we should not ignore this, but should ignore SIM118, i.e. so that preferred behavior here would be to require use of .keys(), .values(), or .items() rather than using the implicit __iter__() dunder in a case like for key in my_dict

[jsstevenson]

Discussion on slack concluded that we should not ignore this, but should ignore SIM118, i.e. so that preferred behavior here would be to require use of .keys(), .values(), or .items() rather than using the implicit iter() dunder in a case like for key in my_dict

FURTHER slack discussion has determined that some of the PLC0206 behavior is less desired so we'll keep SIM118 and ignore PLC0206.

[korikuzma]

In squashed commit, I think it'd be helpful to add that new rules are also being added and ignored