Skip to content

Conversation

@Acconut
Copy link
Contributor

@Acconut Acconut commented Nov 6, 2025

CLA

  • I have signed the Stream CLA (required).
  • Code changes are tested

Description of the changes, What, Why and How?

The campaign API recently added support for a new property members_template that can be used as an alternative to members. Its benefit is that the client is also able to define the channel role and custom data for members that are added to newly created channels for campaigns.

Changelog

  • feat: support members_template property for campaigns

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 6, 2025

Size Change: 0 B

Total Size: 354 kB

ℹ️ View Unchanged
Filename Size
dist/cjs/index.browser.js 118 kB
dist/cjs/index.node.js 119 kB
dist/esm/index.mjs 117 kB

compressed-size-action

@Acconut Acconut merged commit d04fade into master Nov 6, 2025
4 checks passed
@Acconut Acconut deleted the CHA-1302 branch November 6, 2025 09:00
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2025
## [9.26.0](v9.25.0...v9.26.0) (2025-11-18)

### Bug Fixes

* prevent reporting delivery for already reported message ([#1643](#1643)) ([8612079](8612079))
* skip channel.state.last_message_at update on incoming system message if configured ([#1642](#1642)) ([0cd6009](0cd6009))

### Features

* add app_banned and has_unread properties to ChannelFilters ([#1649](#1649)) ([9b580b0](9b580b0))
* add filter tags to channels ([#1646](#1646)) ([4101531](4101531))
* add hide_history_before option for adding members ([#1645](#1645)) ([3c75c12](3c75c12))
* add should_send_custom_events toggle ([#1651](#1651)) ([39abbb6](39abbb6))
* support members_template property for campaigns ([#1647](#1647)) ([d04fade](d04fade))
* support option to mark messages unread by message timestamp ([#1648](#1648)) ([64ddb4b](64ddb4b))
@stream-ci-bot
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 9.26.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants