Skip to content

Conversation

@gurusai-voleti
Copy link
Contributor

Automated: Migrate {target_path} from gsutil to gcloud storage

This CL is part of the on going effort to migrate from the legacy gsutil tool to the new and improved gcloud storage command-line interface.
gcloud storage is the recommended and modern tool for interacting with Google Cloud Storage, offering better performance, unified authentication, and a more consistent command structure with other gcloud components. 🚀

Automation Details

This change was generated automatically by an agent that targets users of gsutil.
The transformations applied are based on the gsutil to gcloud storage migration guide.

⚠️ Action Required: Please Review and Test Carefully

While we have based the automation on the migration guide, every use case is unique.
It is crucial that you thoroughly test these changes in environments appropriate to your use-case before merging.
Be aware of potential differences between gsutil and gcloud storage that could impact your workflows.
For instance, the structure of command output may have changed, requiring updates to any scripts that parse it. Similarly, command behavior can differ subtly; the gcloud storage rsync command has a different file deletion logic than gsutil rsync, which could lead to unintended file deletions.

Our migration guides can help guide you through a list of mappings and some notable differences between the two tools.

Standard presubmit tests are run as part of this CL's workflow. If you need to target an additional test workflow or require assistance with testing, please let us know.

Please verify that all your Cloud Storage operations continue to work as expected to avoid any potential disruptions in production.

Support and Collaboration

The GCS CLI team is here to help! If you encounter any issues, have a complex use case that this automated change doesn't cover, or face any other blockers, please don't hesitate to reach out.
We are happy to work with you to test and adjust these changes as needed.

Contact: [email protected]

We appreciate your partnership in this important migration effort!

#gsutil-migration

@gurusai-voleti gurusai-voleti requested a review from a team as a code owner December 26, 2025 14:10
@gurusai-voleti
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @sm745052, Can we get your review on this PR? Thanks!

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @gurusai-voleti, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request automates the migration of Google Cloud Storage command-line interactions from the legacy gsutil tool to the recommended gcloud storage interface. This change aims to leverage the improved performance, unified authentication, and consistent command structure offered by gcloud storage. While automated, thorough review and testing are crucial to ensure continued functionality, especially given potential differences in command behavior and output parsing as highlighted in the PR description.

Highlights

  • Migration to gcloud storage: Replaced legacy gsutil commands with modern gcloud storage equivalents across several files, aligning with Google Cloud's recommended practices.
  • Automated Change: This pull request was automatically generated as part of an ongoing initiative to standardize Google Cloud Storage interactions.
  • Command Updates: The changes primarily update command examples within README.md files and a comment in a Java source file, specifically replacing gsutil cp with gcloud storage cp and gsutil mb with gcloud storage buckets create.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 26, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 50.78%. Comparing base (96ca64f) to head (c3bde01).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #3161      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     50.79%   50.78%   -0.02%     
+ Complexity     5486     5481       -5     
============================================
  Files           975      975              
  Lines         59984    59984              
  Branches       6552     6552              
============================================
- Hits          30470    30464       -6     
- Misses        27375    27376       +1     
- Partials       2139     2144       +5     
Components Coverage Δ
spanner-templates 70.96% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️
spanner-import-export 68.94% <ø> (-0.08%) ⬇️
spanner-live-forward-migration 80.03% <ø> (ø)
spanner-live-reverse-replication 77.64% <ø> (ø)
spanner-bulk-migration 88.48% <ø> (ø)
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...gle/cloud/teleport/v2/templates/KafkaToPubsub.java 0.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@Abacn Abacn merged commit a5c8617 into GoogleCloudPlatform:main Dec 29, 2025
22 of 24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants