Skip to content

Conversation

@gurusai-voleti
Copy link

Automated: Migrate {target_path} from gsutil to gcloud storage

This CL is part of the on going effort to migrate from the legacy gsutil tool to the new and improved gcloud storage command-line interface.
gcloud storage is the recommended and modern tool for interacting with Google Cloud Storage, offering better performance, unified authentication, and a more consistent command structure with other gcloud components. 🚀

Automation Details

This change was generated automatically by an agent that targets users of gsutil.
The transformations applied are based on the gsutil to gcloud storage migration guide.

⚠️ Action Required: Please Review and Test Carefully

While we have based the automation on the migration guide, every use case is unique.
It is crucial that you thoroughly test these changes in environments appropriate to your use-case before merging.
Be aware of potential differences between gsutil and gcloud storage that could impact your workflows.
For instance, the structure of command output may have changed, requiring updates to any scripts that parse it. Similarly, command behavior can differ subtly; the gcloud storage rsync command has a different file deletion logic than gsutil rsync, which could lead to unintended file deletions.

Our migration guides can help guide you through a list of mappings and some notable differences between the two tools.

Standard presubmit tests are run as part of this CL's workflow. If you need to target an additional test workflow or require assistance with testing, please let us know.

Please verify that all your Cloud Storage operations continue to work as expected to avoid any potential disruptions in production.

Support and Collaboration

The GCS CLI team is here to help! If you encounter any issues, have a complex use case that this automated change doesn't cover, or face any other blockers, please don't hesitate to reach out.
We are happy to work with you to test and adjust these changes as needed.

Contact: [email protected]

We appreciate your partnership in this important migration effort!

#gsutil-migration

@gurusai-voleti
Copy link
Author

Hi @q2w, Can we get your review on this PR? Thanks!

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @gurusai-voleti, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request initiates an automated transition from the legacy gsutil command-line tool to the recommended gcloud storage interface for interacting with Google Cloud Storage. The change aims to leverage the improved performance, unified authentication, and consistent command structure offered by gcloud storage. It involves updating existing documentation and build scripts to reflect the new command syntax, ensuring all Cloud Storage operations continue to function as expected with the modern tool.

Highlights

  • Migration to gcloud storage: This pull request automates the migration of gsutil commands to gcloud storage commands across various files, aligning with Google Cloud's recommendation for the modern and improved gcloud storage CLI.
  • Documentation Updates: The cli/docs/scorecard.md file has been updated to use gcloud storage buckets create and gcloud storage buckets add-iam-policy-binding for GCS bucket operations, and gcloud storage cp for copying files, replacing their gsutil equivalents.
  • Build Script Modifications: Build scripts infra/build/developer-tools/build/install_cloud_sdk.sh and infra/build/developer-tools/build/install_tinkey.sh have been updated to use gcloud -v for version checking and gcloud storage cp for artifact downloads, respectively, replacing gsutil commands.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request contains automated changes to migrate gsutil commands to the recommended gcloud storage equivalent. The updates in the documentation and shell scripts are largely correct. I've identified one minor issue in infra/build/developer-tools/build/install_cloud_sdk.sh where the migration introduced a redundant command. My review includes a suggestion to remove this duplicate call. After addressing this, the changes should be good to go.

Copy link
Collaborator

@apeabody apeabody left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the contribution @gurusai-voleti!

From Test devtools image build / Build CFT dev tools image (pull_request:

#10 18.53 ERROR: (gcloud.storage.cp) You do not currently have an active account selected.
#10 18.53 Please run:
#10 18.53 
#10 18.53   $ gcloud auth login
#10 18.53 
#10 18.53 to obtain new credentials.
#10 18.53 
#10 18.53 If you have already logged in with a different account, run:
#10 18.53 
#10 18.53   $ gcloud config set account ACCOUNT
#10 18.53 
#10 18.53 to select an already authenticated account to use.
#10 ERROR: process "/bin/sh -c /build/install_shellcheck.sh &&     /build/install_hadolint.sh &&     /build/install_addlicense.sh &&     /build/install_gsuite_terraform_provider.sh ${GSUITE_PROVIDER_VERSION} &&     /build/install_terraform_docs.sh ${TERRAFORM_DOCS_VERSION} &&     /build/install_bats.sh ${BATS_VERSION} ${BATS_SUPPORT_VERSION} ${BATS_ASSERT_VERSION} ${BATS_MOCK_VERSION} &&     /build/install_terragrunt.sh ${TERRAGRUNT_VERSION} &&     /build/install_kustomize.sh ${KUSTOMIZE_VERSION} &&     /build/install_protoc.sh ${PROTOC_VERSION} ${PROTOC_GEN_GO_VERSION} ${PROTOC_GEN_GO_GRPC_VERSION} ${PROTOC_GEN_GO_INJECT_TAG} &&     /build/install_tflint.sh ${TFLINT_VERSION} &&     /build/install_tinkey.sh ${TINKEY_VERSION}" did not complete successfully: exit code: 1

Looks like that is due to this usage: https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/cloud-foundation-toolkit/pull/3331/files#diff-7c1ce1c6d7af071bfb2fa0565836dbdbb7dd291ec63049961dc7dba77840144bL24

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants