Skip to content

Conversation

@bhshkh
Copy link
Contributor

@bhshkh bhshkh commented Jan 6, 2026

Description

Fixes b/411641649

Note: Before submitting a pull request, please open an issue for discussion if you are not associated with Google.

Checklist

  • I have followed Contributing Guidelines from CONTRIBUTING.MD
  • Tests pass: go test -v ./.. (see Testing)
  • Code formatted: gofmt (see Formatting)
  • Vetting pass: go vet (see Formatting)
  • These samples need a new API enabled in testing projects to pass (let us know which ones)
  • These samples need a new/updated env vars in testing projects set to pass (let us know which ones)
  • This sample adds a new sample directory, and I updated the CODEOWNERS file with the codeowners for this sample
  • This sample adds a new Product API, and I updated the Blunderbuss issue/PR auto-assigner with the codeowners for this sample
  • Please merge this PR for me once it is approved

@bhshkh bhshkh requested review from a team as code owners January 6, 2026 16:58
@snippet-bot
Copy link

snippet-bot bot commented Jan 6, 2026

Here is the summary of changes.

You are about to add 1 region tag.

This comment is generated by snippet-bot.
If you find problems with this result, please file an issue at:
https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/issues.
To update this comment, add snippet-bot:force-run label or use the checkbox below:

  • Refresh this comment

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the samples Issues that are directly related to samples. label Jan 6, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @bhshkh, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the authentication utilities by adding a new function, validateServiceAccountKey, designed to confirm that a provided JSON file is indeed a Google Cloud service account key. This addition improves the robustness of credential handling by explicitly checking the key's type, thereby reducing potential misconfigurations or security issues arising from using incorrect credential formats. The change is accompanied by thorough testing to ensure its reliability.

Highlights

  • New Service Account Key Validation Function: Introduced validateServiceAccountKey to programmatically verify if a given JSON file is a valid Google Cloud service account key, specifically checking its type.
  • Enhanced Credential Type Safety: The validation leverages google.JWTConfigFromJSON to ensure that the credential type is explicitly "service_account", preventing unintended use of other credential types like "authorized_user".
  • Comprehensive Testing: A new test, TestValidateServiceAccountKey, has been added to auth_test.go to cover both successful validation of a legitimate service account key and error handling for incorrectly formatted or typed keys.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new functionality to validate a service account key, along with corresponding tests. The implementation is straightforward and correct. I've provided a few suggestions to improve error handling, make the code example more generic, and enhance the test structure for better maintainability. Overall, this is a good addition.

bhshkh and others added 4 commits January 6, 2026 09:15
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@bhshkh bhshkh enabled auto-merge (squash) January 6, 2026 17:17
@bhshkh bhshkh marked this pull request as draft January 6, 2026 18:42
auto-merge was automatically disabled January 6, 2026 18:42

Pull request was converted to draft

@bhshkh bhshkh added the do not merge Indicates a pull request not ready for merge, due to either quality or timing. label Jan 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do not merge Indicates a pull request not ready for merge, due to either quality or timing. samples Issues that are directly related to samples.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant