Skip to content

Conversation

lvoelz
Copy link

@lvoelz lvoelz commented Oct 8, 2025

Update custom note creation code samples (as seen in https://cloud.google.com/artifact-analysis/docs/create-notes-occurrences#artifact-analysis-create-note-java) to use attestations instead of vulnerabilities, to align with the changes needed for go/aa-deprecate-3p-metadata.

Update custom note creation code samples (as seen in https://cloud.google.com/artifact-analysis/docs/create-notes-occurrences#artifact-analysis-create-note-java) to use attestations instead of vulnerabilities, to align with the changes needed for go/aa-deprecate-3p-metadata.
@lvoelz lvoelz requested review from a team and yoshi-approver as code owners October 8, 2025 17:19
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added samples Issues that are directly related to samples. api: containeranalysis Issues related to the Container Analysis API. labels Oct 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @lvoelz, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates a Java code sample (CreateNote.java) to reflect a change in how notes are created in Artifact Analysis. It switches from using vulnerability-based note creation to attestation-based note creation, aligning with a planned deprecation of third-party metadata.

Highlights

  • Intent: This PR updates the CreateNote.java code sample to use 'attestations' instead of 'vulnerabilities' when creating notes. This change aligns with upcoming deprecations related to third-party metadata in Artifact Analysis (go/aa-deprecate-3p-metadata).
  • Changes: The CreateNote.java file was modified. Specifically, the Note creation logic was updated to replace the setVulnerability method call and its associated VulnerabilityNote builder with setAttestation and an AttestationNote builder. The AttestationNote is initialized with a Hint containing a humanReadableName.
  • Reviewer Activity: No specific reviewer activity was provided in the context.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

Warning

Gemini encountered an error creating the review. You can try again by commenting /gemini review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api: containeranalysis Issues related to the Container Analysis API. samples Issues that are directly related to samples.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant