-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
Add membership_type field to cluster/fleet #15221
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 11 commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
faa3cb1
Update resource_container_cluster.go.tmpl to support membership_type
anthonyrtong 8b4cf33
Merge branch 'GoogleCloudPlatform:main' into main
anthonyrtong 7ffbe92
Update resource_container_cluster_test.go.tmpl to support membership_…
anthonyrtong 0d507c5
Merge branch 'GoogleCloudPlatform:main' into main
anthonyrtong 8fbc419
Add conversion logic for Fleet membership_type in resource_container_…
anthonyrtong 4c48b33
Update resource_container_cluster.go.tmpl
anthonyrtong b19490f
Merge branch 'GoogleCloudPlatform:main' into main
anthonyrtong 430981f
Add DiffSuppressFunc for Fleet membership_type
anthonyrtong 30be8e1
remove default for Fleet membership_type
anthonyrtong 4c988f2
Update container_cluster.html.markdown
anthonyrtong 25d0927
Update resource_container_cluster.go.tmpl to omit MEMBERSHIP_TYPE_UNS…
anthonyrtong 78cd424
Update membership_type description in container_cluster docs
anthonyrtong 0e6252f
Merge branch 'GoogleCloudPlatform:main' into main
anthonyrtong 4ec4cbf
Remove DiffSuppressFunc from cluster membership type
anthonyrtong File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to confirm, is this meant that the API will return
MEMBERSHIP_TYPE_UNSPECIFIEDwhen the field is unset? I know our validation already blocks explicitly setting this value in the config.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right now it should return the field as unset. Is this DiffSuppressFunc overkill?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, then we can remove this DiffSuppressFunc IMO.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done 👍