-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
chore(gae): Remove older region tags #4015
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @hivanalejandro, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request removes older region tags from the server.js file in the appengine/building-an-app/update directory. It also removes a now-unnecessary test case and fixes a minor formatting issue in test/server.test.js. The goal is to address issue b/399694259.
Highlights
- Region Tag Removal: Removes outdated region tags from
server.jsto clean up the code and improve readability. - Test Cleanup: Removes the
gae_update_apptest case fromtest/server.test.jsas it's no longer needed. - Formatting Fix: Corrects a formatting issue in
test/server.test.jsby adding a space within theproxyquirecall.
Changelog
- appengine/building-an-app/update/server.js
- Removed
[START app]region tag on line 18. - Removed
[START gae_update_app]region tag on line 19. - Removed
[END add_post_handler]region tag on line 52. - Removed
[END gae_update_app]region tag on line 59. - Removed
[END app]region tag on line 60.
- Removed
- appengine/building-an-app/update/test/server.test.js
- Removed the
gae_update_apptest suite from lines 39-48. - Added a space within the
proxyquirecall on line 24.
- Removed the
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Did you know?
The term 'region tag' is often used in cloud computing documentation to denote specific sections of code or configuration that are relevant to a particular region or service.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request aims to remove older region tags from the code, which helps in maintaining a cleaner and more organized codebase. The changes seem straightforward and address the specified issue.
Merge Readiness
The changes appear to be correct and address the intended issue. I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging. The changes are relatively small, and I don't see any immediate issues that would block merging.
| const express = require('express'); | ||
| const path = require('path'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| res.sendFile(path.join(__dirname, '/views/form.html')); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| }); | ||
| // [END gae_add_post_handler] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are about to delete the following frozen region tags.
Here is the summary of changes. You are about to delete 4 region tags.
This comment is generated by snippet-bot.
|
|
@davidcavazos interesting failure with region tags here where it's catching some issues with region tags I believe that aren't directly to do with the PR itself. |
|
In this repo, all region tags must be accounted for in a test description. I think that due to this PR removing some region tags without the description removal, the custard CI / region tags check is telling you to add back the snippet. Also of note, that at least for gae_update_web_server_app / gae_update_app there appears to be a duplicate test rather than a longer description, so removing that test makes sense. |
7b4db4f to
28cb9d9
Compare
It didn't look like the region tags getting removed were the ones that it was complaining about. But it's been a day and I don't remember exactly what I saw. It looked to me like they were region tags that existed in the area that still existed. |
|
@glasnt yeah now it's not erroring out because the PR has been updated to remove them. So it's an interesting area where it's identifying region tags no longer needed potentially? |
Description
Fixes b/399694259
Note: Before submitting a pull request, please open an issue for discussion if you are not associated with Google.
Checklist
npm test(see Testing)npm run lint(see Style)GoogleCloudPlatform/nodejs-docs-samples. Not a fork.