Skip to content

typo: nodejs versions build var#1878

Merged
loosebazooka merged 1 commit intoGoogleContainerTools:mainfrom
AdlinBP:nodejs-versions-var-typo
Oct 1, 2025
Merged

typo: nodejs versions build var#1878
loosebazooka merged 1 commit intoGoogleContainerTools:mainfrom
AdlinBP:nodejs-versions-var-typo

Conversation

@AdlinBP
Copy link
Contributor

@AdlinBP AdlinBP commented Sep 30, 2025

Node.js versions build variable typo

Fixes #1877

@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @AdlinBP, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a minor but important typo in the nodejs/BUILD file. The variable responsible for defining Node.js major versions was misspelled, and this change rectifies it to NODEJS_MAJOR_VERSIONS. This ensures accuracy and consistency in the build configuration, improving code readability and maintainability without altering functionality.

Highlights

  • Typo Correction: Corrected a spelling mistake in the NODEJS_MAJOR_VERISONS variable name within the nodejs/BUILD file.
  • Variable Renaming: The variable NODEJS_MAJOR_VERISONS has been consistently renamed to NODEJS_MAJOR_VERSIONS across its definition and all subsequent usages.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes a typo in the NODEJS_MAJOR_VERSIONS variable name in the nodejs/BUILD file. The change is consistent and improves readability. I have also left one comment with a suggestion to improve the maintainability of the file by reducing code duplication, which you might consider for a future refactoring.

for mode in MODE
for user in USER
for major_version in NODEJS_MAJOR_VERISONS
for major_version in NODEJS_MAJOR_VERSIONS
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While you're fixing the variable name, I noticed that the surrounding iteration logic is repeated in several places throughout this file (e.g., lines 29-32, 44-48, 65-69). This code duplication can make the build file harder to maintain in the long run.

As a suggestion for future improvement, you could consider refactoring this logic into a Starlark macro in a .bzl file. The macro could encapsulate the common iteration logic and generate the targets. This would centralize the logic and make future changes easier.

@loosebazooka loosebazooka merged commit e3d7bff into GoogleContainerTools:main Oct 1, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

typo: NODEJS_MAJOR_VERISONS

2 participants