Skip to content

Conversation

@mattsanta
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@mattsanta mattsanta requested a review from a team as a code owner November 13, 2025 20:08
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @mattsanta, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on preparing for the Skaffold v2.17.0 release by updating the changelog and refreshing various dependencies across different example projects. These updates ensure compatibility with newer versions of Go and Ruby libraries, maintaining the stability and currency of the project's examples.

Highlights

  • Skaffold v2.17.0 Release Entry: The CHANGELOG.md has been updated to include the release notes for Skaffold version 2.17.0, providing installation instructions for various platforms and a Docker image tag.
  • Go Module Updates: The go.mod and go.sum files in the cloud-spanner-bootstrap example have been updated to Go version 1.23.0, and several Go dependencies, including cloud.google.com/go/compute/metadata and golang.org/x/oauth2, have been upgraded.
  • Ruby Dependency Update: The Gemfile.lock in the Ruby backend example has been updated to use rack version 2.2.20.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added size/L and removed size/M labels Nov 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request prepares for the v2.17.0 release by updating the changelog and bumping dependency versions in some example projects. The changes are mostly straightforward. I've provided a couple of suggestions for improving consistency in the changelog's installation instructions and in a go.mod file.

Comment on lines +2 to +12
**Linux amd64**
`curl -Lo skaffold https://storage.googleapis.com/skaffold/releases/v2.17.0/skaffold-linux-amd64 && chmod +x skaffold && sudo mv skaffold /usr/local/bin`

**Linux arm64**
`curl -Lo skaffold https://storage.googleapis.com/skaffold/releases/v2.17.0/skaffold-linux-arm64 && chmod +x skaffold && sudo mv skaffold /usr/local/bin`

**macOS amd64**
`curl -Lo skaffold https://storage.googleapis.com/skaffold/releases/v2.17.0/skaffold-darwin-amd64 && chmod +x skaffold && sudo mv skaffold /usr/local/bin`

**macOS arm64**
`curl -Lo skaffold https://storage.googleapis.com/skaffold/releases/v2.17.0/skaffold-darwin-arm64 && chmod +x skaffold && sudo mv skaffold /usr/local/bin`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The installation commands in this changelog use chmod +x ... && sudo mv .... For consistency with the project's official installation documentation and for better practice, it's recommended to use sudo install instead. The install command is more suitable for this purpose as it handles setting permissions correctly, making the separate chmod +x step unnecessary.

For example, the Linux amd64 installation command should be:

curl -Lo skaffold https://storage.googleapis.com/skaffold/releases/v2.17.0/skaffold-linux-amd64 && sudo install skaffold /usr/local/bin

This change should be applied to all similar installation commands in this block.

module github.com/GoogleContainerTools/skaffold/v2/integration/examples/grpc-e2e-tests/cloud-spanner-bootstrap

go 1.19
go 1.23.0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The Go version 1.23.0 is unconventional. The standard Go toolchain uses the format x.y for go.mod files (e.g., go 1.23). While 1.23.0 is technically valid, using the standard format improves consistency across the project and aligns with Go's tooling conventions.

Suggested change
go 1.23.0
go 1.23

@mattsanta mattsanta merged commit 561ce51 into main Nov 13, 2025
19 checks passed
@mattsanta mattsanta deleted the new_release branch November 13, 2025 20:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants