Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Yes - I've come across this before (#308 (comment))

Im not sure what the original rationale was for not having a name in PeakMatrix and whether there will be unforeseen downstream consequences. I'm also not sure what the ideal "name" of a peak should be.

For what its worth, you can get around this. For example:

ps <- projHeme5@peakSet
ps$name <- paste0(seqnames(ps),"_peak",ps$idx)
projHeme5@peakSet <- ps
projHeme5 <- addPeakMatrix(ArchRProj = projHeme5, force = TRUE, threads = 16)
plotEmbedding(
  ArchRProj = projHeme5,
  colorBy = "PeakMatrix",
  name = c("chr1_peak300"),
  embedding = "UMAP",
  quantCut = c(0.01, 0.95),
  imputeWeights = getImputeWeights(ArchRProj = projHeme5),
  rastr …

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@Zepeng-Mu
Comment options

Answer selected by Zepeng-Mu
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants