Skip to content

Conversation

@Guts
Copy link
Owner

@Guts Guts commented Jun 17, 2024

No description provided.

@Guts Guts force-pushed the improve/single-progress-for-both-quick-fail-and-normal-mode branch from 3409de5 to e0b1037 Compare June 17, 2024 22:28
@github-actions github-actions bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Jun 17, 2024
@Guts Guts enabled auto-merge June 17, 2024 22:28
@Guts Guts disabled auto-merge June 17, 2024 22:29
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 17, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 23.54%. Comparing base (f1e1109) to head (84719df).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #311   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   23.53%   23.54%           
=======================================
  Files          43       43           
  Lines        2923     2922    -1     
  Branches      405      405           
=======================================
  Hits          688      688           
+ Misses       2187     2186    -1     
  Partials       48       48           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 23.54% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
dicogis/georeaders/process_files.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

@Guts Guts force-pushed the improve/single-progress-for-both-quick-fail-and-normal-mode branch from e0b1037 to 12555dc Compare June 17, 2024 22:35
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@Guts Guts force-pushed the improve/single-progress-for-both-quick-fail-and-normal-mode branch from 12555dc to 84719df Compare July 26, 2024 12:48
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants