Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Nov 25, 2025

📝 Pull Request

📋 Description

Adds a complete production-ready documentation suite including README with badges, contributing guidelines, security policy, code of conduct, issue templates, and PR template.

🔗 Related Issue

Fixes #1

🏷 Type of Change

  • feat – New feature
  • fix – Bug fix
  • docs – Documentation changes
  • style – Code style changes (formatting, etc.)
  • refactor – Code refactoring
  • perf – Performance improvements
  • test – Adding or updating tests
  • build – Build system or dependency changes
  • ci – CI/CD configuration changes
  • chore – Maintenance tasks
  • revert – Reverting previous changes

📝 Summary of Changes

Root-level documentation:

  • README.md — Complete rewrite with shields.io badges, installation/usage instructions, folder structure, tech stack, and dependency listings (auto-detected from both package.json files)
  • LICENSE — MIT license
  • CONTRIBUTING.md — Fork/contribute workflow, code style, commit conventions
  • SECURITY.md — Vulnerability reporting policy
  • CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md — Contributor Covenant v2.1

GitHub templates:

  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml — YAML issue form with severity, environment, logs
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml — YAML issue form for enhancements
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml — Disables blank issues, adds contact links
  • .github/pull_request_template.md — PR checklist template

💭 Motivation and Context

Repository lacked standard open-source documentation. This provides contributors with clear guidelines and maintainers with structured issue/PR workflows.

🧪 How Has This Been Tested?

Documentation-only changes — validated markdown syntax and file structure.

Test Environment:

  • N/A (documentation)

Test Steps:

  1. Verified all files created in correct locations
  2. Confirmed shields.io badge URLs use correct owner/repo

📸 Screenshots (if applicable)

N/A

✅ Checklist

  • My code follows the project's code style guidelines
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have run npm run lint and fixed any issues
  • I have run npm run build successfully
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published

⚠️ Breaking Changes

  • This PR introduces breaking changes

Description of breaking changes:

N/A

📚 Additional Notes

The folder structure in README reflects actual filenames including the Reveiw_page.jsx typo present in the repo — intentionally kept accurate rather than "correcting" it in documentation.

Original prompt

📄 Complete GitHub Project Documentation Generator (Ultimate Prompt)

You are tasked with generating a complete and professional documentation setup for ANY GitHub repository I provide.

Global rule for existing files:

  • Do not overwrite existing files. If a target file already exists in the repository (in the root or .github directory), leave it as-is and only create the missing ones.
  • This skip-existing rule applies to: LICENSE, CONTRIBUTING.md, SECURITY.md, CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, issue templates, and the pull request template.

Your output must include:


1️⃣ README.md

The README must follow this exact structure and style:

  • Project Title (use repo name dynamically).

  • Badges Section (centered at the top). Use Shields.io dynamically with repo details:

md

GitHub License
GitHub Stars
GitHub Forks
GitHub Issues
GitHub Pull Requests
Contributions Welcome

Last Commit
Commit Activity
Repo Size
Code Size

Top Language
Languages Count

Build Status
Vulnerabilities

Discussions
Documentation
Open Source Love

  • Short Project Description (auto from repo metadata).

  • 🔗 Links Section (Demo / Docs / Issues / Contributing).

  • 📑 Table of Contents.

  • 🚀 Installation (prerequisites + setup steps).

  • ⚡ Usage Examples (CLI / API / UI depending on repo type).

  • ✨ Features.

  • 📂 Folder Structure (auto-generated from repo).

  • 📦 Submodules Section

    • If the repo includes Git submodules / sub repos, list them explicitly with links and short descriptions.

    • Example:

      md

      📦 Submodules

  • 🤝 Contributing → link to CONTRIBUTING.md.

  • 📜 License → link to LICENSE.

  • 🛡 Security → link to SECURITY.md.

  • 📏 Code of Conduct → link to CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md.

  • 🛠 Tech Stack:

    • Auto-detect frameworks, libraries, languages, databases, tools, services.

    • Represent each with a Shields.io badge:

      md
      MongoDB

    • Group into categories:

      • Languages
      • Frameworks & Libraries
      • Databases
      • DevOps / CI / Tools
      • Cloud / Hosting
  • 📦 Dependencies & Packages:

    • Auto-detect and list ALL project dependencies used in this repository, similar to the Tech Stack, displayed as badges (“boxes”). Include package names and their current versions where possible.
    • Clearly separate:
      • Runtime Dependencies
      • Dev Dependencies
      • Peer/Optional Dependencies (if applicable)
    • Detection sources by ecosystem:
      • Node.js: package.json (dependencies, devDependencies, peerDependencies, optionalDependencies), plus lockfiles (package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml).
      • Python: requirements.txt, requirements/*.txt, pyproject.toml (Poetry/PEP 621), poetry.lock, setup.cfg, setup.py, Pipfile, Pipfile.lock.
      • Java: pom.xml (Maven), build.gradle / build.gradle.kts (Gradle), gradle.lockfile.
      • .NET: .csproj/.fsproj, Directory.Packages.props, packages....

💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Generate complete GitHub project documentation Add comprehensive GitHub project documentation Nov 25, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from H0NEYP0T-466 November 25, 2025 15:12
@H0NEYP0T-466 H0NEYP0T-466 marked this pull request as ready for review November 25, 2025 15:14
@H0NEYP0T-466 H0NEYP0T-466 merged commit d9acb9b into master Nov 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants